Clinicopathologic findings from lacrimal sac biopsy specimens obtained during dacryocystorhinostomy

被引:93
作者
Anderson, NG [1 ]
Wojno, TH [1 ]
Grossniklaus, HE [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.IOP.0000066646.59045.5A
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose; To retrospectively review the pathologic diagnoses and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods: Specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001 in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory were reviewed. All of the specimens included a lacrimal sac biopsy specimen. The pathologic diagnoses were recorded. The clinical features of the patients with significant pathologic abnormalities were reviewed to determine if the pathology was suspected before or at the time of the DCR. Results: There were 377 DCR specimens from 316 patients representing 1.8% of 21,018 ophthalmic pathology specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001. Diagnoses, in decreasing order of frequency, were nongranulomatous inflammation (321, 85.1%), granulomatous inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis (8, 2.1%), lymphoma (7, 1.9%), papilloma (4, 1.1%), lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (4, 1.1%), transitional cell carcinoma (2, 0.5%), and single cases of adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, granular cell tumor, plasmacytoma, and leukemic infiltrate. A total of 31 (8.2%) specimens from 25 (7.9%) of patients demonstrated significant pathology. Among 17 specimens (4.5%) from 14 patients with neoplasms whose clinical histories were available, 8 (2.1%) were not suspected before surgery. Conclusions: Nongranulomatous inflammation consistent with chronic dacryocystitis is the most common diagnosis in lacrimal sac specimens obtained at DCR. Neoplasms resulting in chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction occurred in 4.6% of cases and were unsuspected before surgery in 2.1% of patients. We recommend pathologic examination of DCR specimens.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 176
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Routine histopathologic evaluation of the lacrimal sac during dacryocystorhinostomy - How useful is it? [J].
Bernardini, FP ;
Moin, M ;
Kersten, RC ;
Reeves, D ;
Kulwin, DR .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (07) :1214-1217
[2]  
HORNBLASS A, 1980, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V87, P476
[3]   Clinicopathologic analysis of 166 patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction [J].
Lee-Wing, MW ;
Ashenhurst, ME .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (11) :2038-2040
[4]  
LINBERG JV, 1986, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V93, P1055
[5]   CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF LACRIMAL SAC AND NASAL-MUCOSA IN 44 PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE ACQUIRED NASOLACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION [J].
MAURIELLO, JA ;
PALYDOWYCZ, S ;
DELUCA, J .
OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1992, 8 (01) :13-21
[6]   Glandular tumors of the lacrimal sac - Their histopathologic patterns and possible origins [J].
Peer, J ;
Hidayat, AA ;
Ilsar, M ;
Landau, L ;
Stefanyszyn, MA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1996, 103 (10) :1601-1605
[7]   PRIMARY EPITHELIAL NEOPLASMS OF LACRIMAL SAC [J].
RYAN, SJ ;
FONT, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1973, 76 (01) :73-88
[8]  
SHARARA N, IN PRESS OPHTHALMOLO
[9]  
SPRAUL CW, 1998, INT OPHTHALMOL, V126, P844
[10]   Clinically suspected primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction - Clinicopathologic review of 150 patients [J].
Tucker, N ;
Chow, D ;
Stockl, F ;
Codere, F ;
Burnier, M .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (11) :1882-1886