Spatial Contrast Sensitivity at Twilight: Luminance, Monocularity, and Oxygenation

被引:15
作者
Connolly, Desmond M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] QinetiQ PLC, Human Protect & Performance Enhancement Grp, Farnborough GU14 0LX, Hants, England
[2] City Univ London, Appl Vis Res Ctr, Henry Wellcome Labs Vis Sci, London EC1V 0HB, England
来源
AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE | 2010年 / 81卷 / 05期
关键词
spatial contrast sensitivity; mesopic vision; binocular summation; hypoxia; gender; VISUAL PERFORMANCE; DARK-ADAPTATION; MILD HYPOXIA; VISION; HYPEROXIA; ACUITY; FREQUENCY; ALTITUDE; TIME;
D O I
10.3357/ASEM.2728.2010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
CONNOLLY DM. Spatial contrast sensitivity at twilight. luminance, monocularity, and oxygenation. Aviat Space Environ Med 2010; 81:475-83 Introduction. Visual performance in dim light is compromised by lack of oxygen (hypoxia) The possible influence of altered oxygenation on foveal contrast sensitivity under mesopic (twilight) viewing conditions is relevant to aircrew flying at night, including when using night vision devices, but is poorly documented Methods. Foveal contrast sensitivity was measured binocularly and monocularly in 12 subjects at 7 spatial frequencies, ranging from 0 5 to similar to 16 cycles per degree, using sinusoidal Gabor patch gratings Hypoxic performance breathing 14 1% oxygen, equivalent to altitude exposure at 3048 m (10,000 ft), was compared with breathing air at sea level (normoxia) at low photopic (28 cd . m(-2)), borderline upper mesopic (similar to 2 1 cd . m(-2)) and midmesopic (similar to 0 26 cd . m(-2)) luminance Mesopic performance was also assessed breathing 100% oxygen (hyperoxia) Results: Typical 'inverted U' log/log plots of the contrast sensitivity function were obtained, with elevated thresholds (reduced sensitivity) at lower luminance Binocular viewing enhanced sensitivity by a factor approximating root 2 for most conditions, supporting neural summation of the contrast signal, but had greater influence at the lowest light level and highest spatial frequencies (8 26 and 16 51 cpd) Respiratory challenges had no effect Conclusions: Contrast sensitivity is poorer when viewing monocularly and especially at midmesopic luminance, with relevance to night flying The foveal contrast sensitivity function is unaffected by respiratory disturbance when twilight conditions favor cone vision, despite known effects on retinal illumination (pupil size) The resilience of the contrast sensitivity function belies the vulnerability of foveal low contrast acuity to mild hypoxia at mesopic luminance
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 483
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Moving objects appear to slow down at low contrasts [J].
Anstis, S .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2003, 16 (5-6) :933-938
[2]   Spare the rod and spoil the eye [J].
Arden, GB ;
Sidman, RL ;
Arap, W ;
Schlingemann, RO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 89 (06) :764-769
[3]   The application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) to different experimental designs in optometry [J].
Armstrong, RA ;
Eperjesi, F ;
Gilmartin, B .
OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2002, 22 (03) :248-256
[4]   Effect of different levels of hyperoxia on breathing in healthy subjects [J].
Becker, HF ;
Polo, O ;
McNamara, SG ;
BerthonJones, M ;
Sullivan, CE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 81 (04) :1683-1690
[5]   Short-term hypobaric hypoxia enhances visual contrast sensitivity [J].
Benedek, K ;
Kéri, K ;
Grósz, A ;
Tótka, Z ;
Tóth, E ;
Benedek, G .
NEUROREPORT, 2002, 13 (08) :1063-1066
[6]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN RESPONSE TO SPATIAL-FREQUENCY AND STIMULUS ORIENTATION [J].
BRABYN, LB ;
MCGUINNESS, D .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1979, 26 (04) :319-324
[7]   MONOCULAR VERSUS BINOCULAR VISUAL ACUITY [J].
CAMPBELL, FW ;
GREEN, DG .
NATURE, 1965, 208 (5006) :191-&
[8]  
Chisholm CM, 2003, AVIAT SPACE ENVIR MD, V74, P551
[9]   Aviation-related respiratory gas disturbances affect dark adaptation: A reappraisal [J].
Connolly, Desmond M. ;
Hosking, Sarah L. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2006, 46 (11) :1784-1793
[10]   Oxygenation State and Mesopic Sensitivity to Dynamic Contrast Stimuli [J].
Connolly, Desmond M. ;
Hosking, Sarah L. .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2009, 86 (12) :1368-1375