Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:10
作者
Kryvenko, Oleksandr N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Epstein, Jonathan I. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Urol, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
Grade Group; prostate cancer; significant; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; TUMOR VOLUME; EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; SCORE; DISEASE; MEN; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/MOU.0000000000000388
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review This chapter describes important changes in the clinical practice and pathological interpretation of prostate cancer (PCa) that stratify PCa into insignificant and significant disease to allow for better patient management and treatment decisions. Recent findings Among the most important changes over the last half a decade has been the change in PCa grading. A new grading system has been developed that is more patient-centric with more accurate stratification according to risk of disease progression. An additional advance is the recent recommendation to report percentage of pattern 4 in Gleason score 7 cancer that may help identify a subset of these men who have relatively insignificant prostate cancer. The definition of significant PCa at prostatectomy has also been extended from a dichotomized classification into a more tiered nuanced approach. Factors involved in classification of significant cancer at prostatectomy include grade, stage along with classification of extraprostatic extension into focal and nonfocal, and tumor volume. Of these variables, tumor volume appears to be least critical as an independent variable. Promising genetic discoveries may also help predict significant cancer, especially in the small subset of lower-grade cancers. Summary Significant PCa is a spectrum of findings bearing different clinical significance with some nuanced definitions at biopsy and prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[12]  
Epstein JI, 2016, AM J SURG PATHOL, V40, P137, DOI 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000563
[13]   A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Zelefsky, Michael J. ;
Sjoberg, Daniel D. ;
Nelson, Joel B. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Vickers, Andrew J. ;
Parwani, Anil V. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Fine, Samson W. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Wiklund, Peter ;
Han, Misop ;
Reddy, Chandana A. ;
Ciezki, Jay P. ;
Nyberg, Tommy ;
Klein, Eric A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (03) :428-435
[14]   Prognostic Significance of Tumor Volume in Radical Prostatectomy and Needle Biopsy Specimens [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (03) :790-797
[15]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[16]  
GLEASON DONALD F., 1966, CANCER CHEMO THERAP REP, V50, P125
[17]   Outcome of Gleason 3+5=8 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed on Needle Biopsy: Prognostic Comparison with Gleason 4+4=8 [J].
Harding-Jackson, Nicholas ;
Kryvenko, Oleksandr N. ;
Whittington, Elizabeth E. ;
Eastwood, Daniel C. ;
Tjionas, George A. ;
Jorda, Merce ;
Iczkowski, Kenneth A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (04) :1076-1081
[18]  
Humphrey PA., 2016, WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs, P138
[19]   The Relationship Between the Extent of Extraprostatic Extension and Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Jeong, Byong Chang ;
Chalfin, Heather J. ;
Lee, Seung Bae ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Han, Misop .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (02) :342-346
[20]   Do Black NonHispanic Men Produce Less Prostate Specific Antigen in Benign Prostate Tissue or Cancer Compared to White NonHispanic Men with Gleason Score 6 (Grade Group 1) Prostate Cancer? [J].
Kryvenko, Oleksandr N. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Cote, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (06) :1659-1663