Proactive control of affective distraction: Experience-based but not expectancy-based

被引:11
作者
Schmidts, Constantin [1 ]
Foerster, Anna [1 ]
Kleinsorge, Thomas [1 ]
Kunde, Wilfried [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
Attention; Affect; Proactive control; Emotion regulation; COGNITIVE CONTROL; INTERFERENCE; ATTENTION; MOTIVATION; MODULATION; MECHANISMS; STIMULI;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104072
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Unpleasant stimuli disrupt ongoing information processing, even when they are entirely task-irrelevant. We examined whether such affective disturbances can be controlled explicitly and proactively. Specifically, we studied two different mechanisms to induce proactive control: the experience of frequent affective distraction and cueing of upcoming affective distraction. We predicted that both mechanisms would shield the attentional system from affective disturbance. Participants solved a letter classification task while being exposed to neutral or negative distractor pictures. We varied whether the proportion of negative distractors was low or high and whether cues for the upcoming type of distractor valence were informative or uninformative. In three experiments (N = 114), we found support for the notion that experience-based control shields information processing from affective disturbances, whereas distractor valence expectations were not helpful. These data suggest that there is no explicit top-down influence on attentional control settings of affective distraction, just adjustments to the context.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Can we shield ourselves from task disturbance by emotion-laden stimulation? [J].
Augst, Susanne ;
Kleinsorge, Thomas ;
Kunde, Wilfried .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 14 (03) :1009-1025
[2]   Trigger warning: Empirical evidence ahead [J].
Bellet, Benjamin W. ;
Jones, Payton J. ;
McNally, Richard J. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 61 :134-141
[3]   Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism [J].
Botvinick, Matthew ;
Braver, Todd .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 66, 2015, 66 :83-113
[4]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[5]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113
[6]  
Braver TS., 2007, Variation in working memory, P76
[7]   Expecting the Worst: Investigating the Effects of Trigger Warnings on Reactions to Ambiguously Themed Photos [J].
Bridgland, Victoria M. E. ;
Green, Deanne M. ;
Oulton, Jacinta M. ;
Takarangi, Melanie K. T. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2019, 25 (04) :602-617
[8]   The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control [J].
Bugg, Julie M. ;
Smallwood, Alicia .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2016, 80 (01) :16-33
[9]   Expectations and Experience: Dissociable Bases for Cognitive Control? [J].
Bugg, Julie M. ;
Diede, Nathaniel T. ;
Cohen-Shikora, Emily R. ;
Selmeczy, Diana .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2015, 41 (05) :1349-1373
[10]   In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: a review of the literature on proportion congruent effects [J].
Bugg, Julie M. ;
Crump, Matthew J. C. .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3