The relation between Assessment for Learning and elementary students' cognitive and metacognitive strategy use

被引:48
作者
Baas, Diana [1 ]
Castelijns, Jos [2 ]
Vermeulen, Marjan [3 ]
Martens, Rob [3 ]
Segers, Mien [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Educ Res & Dev, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] De Kempel Inst Teacher Educ, Helmond, Netherlands
[3] Open Univ, Welten Inst, Heerlen, Netherlands
关键词
Assessment for Learning; elementary education; metacognitive strategies; cognitivestrategies; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; SELF-REGULATION; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; CLASSROOM; MOTIVATION; FEEDBACK; PRINCIPLES; TEACHERS; EFFICACY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/bjep.12058
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundAssessment for Learning (AfL) is believed to create a rich learning environment in which students develop their cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Monitoring student growth and providing scaffolds that shed light on the next step in the learning process are hypothesized to be essential elements of AfL that enhance cognitive and metacognitive strategies. However, empirical evidence for the relation between AfL and students' strategy use is scarce. AimThis study investigates the relation between AfL and elementary school students' use of cognitive and metacognitive strategies. SampleThe sample comprised 528 grade four to six students (9- to 12-year-olds) from seven Dutch elementary schools. MethodsStudents' perceptions of AfL and their cognitive and metacognitive strategy use were measured by means of questionnaires. Structural equation modelling was used to investigate the relations among the variables. ResultsThe results reveal that monitoring activities that provide students an understanding of where they are in their learning process predict Students' task orientation and planning. Scaffolding activities that support students in taking the next step in their learning are positively related to the use of both surface and deep-level learning strategies and the extent to which they evaluate their learning process after performing tasks. ConclusionsThe results underline the importance of assessment practices in ceding responsibility to students in taking control of their own learning.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 46
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Birenbaum M., 2009, Studies in Educational Evaluation, V35, P130, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2010.01.001
[12]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, V5, P7, DOI [10.1080/0969595980050102, DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102]
[13]  
Black P., 2004, Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom
[14]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31
[15]   Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention [J].
Boekaerts, M ;
Corno, L .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2005, 54 (02) :199-231
[16]   Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students [J].
Boekaerts, M .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 1997, 7 (02) :161-186
[17]  
Boekaerts M., 1999, INT J EDUC RES, V31, P445, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2, 10.1016/s0883-0355(99)00014-2]
[18]  
BUTLER DL, 1995, REV EDUC RES, V65, P245, DOI 10.3102/00346543065003245
[19]   Is the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ) a good predictor of academic achievement? Examining the mediating role of achievement-related classroom behaviours [J].
Choy, Jeanette Lyn Fung ;
O'Grady, Glen ;
Rotgans, Jerome I. .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01) :159-172
[20]   Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning [J].
Clark, Ian .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 24 (02) :205-249