Regional Integration, Foreign Policy and Executive/Legislative Relations. Presidentialism vs. Parliamentarism: Uruguay in Mercosul and the United Kingdom in the European Union

被引：0
作者：
de Almeida Medeiros, Marcelo [1 ]
de Araujo Ramos, Maria Regina [1 ]
de Souza Oliveira, Natalia Coelho [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Ciencia Polit, Recife, PE, Brazil
来源：
MERIDIANO 47-JOURNAL OF GLOBAL STUDIES | 2021年 / 22卷
关键词：
European Union; Executive-Legislative Relations; Mercosul; United Kingdom; Uruguay;
D O I：
10.20889/M47e22008
中图分类号：
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号：
030207 ;
摘要：
Do the different institutional arrangements in Uruguay and the United Kingdom matter for decision-making on regional integration processes? This study compares the cases to identify the factors that led to Uruguayan stability in Mercosul and the British exit from the European Union. The data show that Westminster was a facilitator for Brexit to take place, while Uruguayan presidentialism could hinder a similar bargain in Mercosul.
引用
收藏
页数：18
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Almeida P.R., 2002, Sao Paulo em Perspectiva, V16, P3
[2]  
Batista Mariana, 2016, Rev. Sociol. Polit., V24, P127
[3]  
Castle Stephen, 2018, NEW YORK TIMES
[4]   Government coalitions under presidentialism and parliamentarism [J].
Cheibub, JA ;
Przeworski, A ;
Saiegh, S .
DADOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS SOCIAIS, 2002, 45 (02) :187-218
[5]   Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities [J].
De Lima, MRS ;
Hirst, M .
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2006, 82 (01) :21-+
[6]  
Decresci Samuel, 2015, Revista Sem Aspas, V4, P48
[7]  
Dickinson Harry T., 2011, Valahian Journal of Historical Studies, V16, P177
[8]  
FIDEL R, 1984, LIBR INFORM SCI RES, V6, P273
[9]  
Folter Regiane, 2020, Politize
[10]  
Gaskarth Jamie, 2013, British foreign policy: crises, conflicts and future challenges, V1
1234