Globally flexible functional forms: The neural distance function

被引:12
作者
Michaelides, Panayotis G. [1 ]
Vouldis, Angelos T. [2 ,3 ]
Tsionas, Efthymios G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Appl Math & Phys, Dept Humanities Social Sci & Law, Lab Theoret & Appl Econ, Athens 15780, Greece
[2] Univ Athens, UADPhilecon, GR-10679 Athens, Greece
[3] Bank Greece, Financial Stabil Dept, Athens 10564, Greece
[4] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Econ, Athens 10434, Greece
关键词
Output distance function; Translog; Technical efficiency; ANN; LIML; STOCHASTIC FRONTIER MODELS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY; IMPOSING CURVATURE; NETWORKS; BOOTSTRAP; INFERENCE; APPROXIMATION; PERFORMANCE; SCORES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.013
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The output distance function is a key concept in economics. However, its empirical estimation often violates properties dictated by neoclassical production theory. In this paper, we introduce the neural distance function (NDF) which constitutes a global approximation to any arbitrary production technology with multiple outputs given by a neural network (NN) specification. The NDF imposes all theoretical properties such as monotonicity, curvature and homogeneity, for all economically admissible values of outputs and inputs. Fitted to a large data set for all US commercial banks (1989-2000), the NDF explains a very high proportion of the variance of output while keeping the number of parameters to a minimum and satisfying the relevant theoretical properties. All measures such as total factor productivity (TFP) and technical efficiency (TE) are computed routinely. Next, the NDF is compared with the Translog popular specification and is found to provide very satisfactory results as it possesses the properties thought as desirable in neoclassical production theory in a way not matched by its competing specification. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 469
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econ., V6, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[2]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[3]  
Anders U, 1998, J FORECASTING, V17, P369, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(1998090)17:5/6<369::AID-FOR702>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-S
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1991, The practice of econometrics: classic and contemporary
[6]   A comparison of data envelopment analysis and artificial neural networks as tools for assessing the efficiency of decision making units [J].
Athanassopoulos, AD ;
Curram, SP .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1996, 47 (08) :1000-1016
[7]  
Bishop CM., 1995, NEURAL NETWORKS PATT
[8]  
Brümmer B, 2002, AM J AGR ECON, V84, P628, DOI 10.1111/1467-8276.00324
[9]  
Chan NH, 2001, IEEE T NEURAL NETWOR, V12, P922, DOI 10.1109/72.935100
[10]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444