Factors influencing grafting success and compatibility of grape rootstocks

被引:44
|
作者
Vrsic, Stanko [1 ]
Pulko, Borut [1 ]
Kocsis, Laszlo [2 ]
机构
[1] Fac Agr & Life Sci, SLO-2231 Hoce, Slovenia
[2] Georgikon Fac, H-8360 Keszthely, Hungary
关键词
Grapevine; Compatibility; Rootstock; Graft; Shoot growth; Root development; PHYLLOXERA; EXPRESSION; BORNER; VITIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2014.10.058
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The aim of this work was to examine the compatibility of different rootstocks with various wine grape varieties. In the first trial, Vitis vinifera L cvs. Furmint, Regent, Riesling, Sauvignon Blanc, and Welschriesling were grafted onto Borner, 5BB and SO4 rootstocks. In the second trial Welschriesling was grafted on 12 rootstocks. Their growth during the first year in the vineyard was measured. As an index of compatibility, the percentage of first grade grafted vines as well as dry weight of mature shoots (canes) and roots was determined. After the grafts went through the first phase of healing often called callusing (2-3 weeks of moist warm conditions), the differences in callus formation were greater between years than among rootstocks, which were the most obvious with Furmint as a scion. No good callus formation occurred when cane (rootstock, scion) maturity is not adequate. Such was the case in 2005, there were 24% fewer grafts with fully developed callus than those in 2006. The dry weight of roots was higher on 5BB than on Borner and SO4. Borner rootstock had fewer roots, and the roots were thinner. Welschriesling had good compatibility with all rootstocks (the average grafts success was 67%), but that of 5BB, G251, and G103 (above 80%),was greater than the average. The G103 rootstock had the highest dry weight of roots. Shoot growth in vineyards was above the average with 5BB, SO4, Binova, Rimer, and MV rootstocks. All Georgikon rootstocks had a lower cane dry weight per vine than the others. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 173
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SUCCESS AND SAFETY OF AMNIOCENTESIS
    MILLER, WA
    KACOYANIS, ST
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1982, 34 (06) : A102 - A102
  • [23] FACTORS INFLUENCING SUCCESS ON CPA EXAMINATION
    REILLY, FK
    STETTLER, HF
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1973, 10 (02) : 308 - 321
  • [24] FACTORS INFLUENCING SUCCESS OF TUBOPLASTIC PROCEDURES
    CRANE, M
    WOODRUFF, JD
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1968, 19 (05) : 810 - &
  • [25] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE SCHOOL SUCCESS OF THE BLIND
    Pechstein, Louis A.
    SCHOOL AND SOCIETY, 1924, 19 (472): : 47 - 52
  • [26] FACTORS INFLUENCING CAREER SUCCESS IN NURSING
    ZIMMERMAN, L
    YEAWORTH, R
    RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1986, 9 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [27] FACTORS INFLUENCING SUCCESS OF APPLIED RESEARCH
    GLASER, EM
    TAYLOR, SH
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1973, 28 (02) : 140 - 146
  • [28] FACTORS INFLUENCING SCHOOL SUCCESS IN BOOKKEEPING
    Stedman, Melissa Branson
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1930, 14 (01) : 74 - 82
  • [29] AORTOFEMORAL GRAFTING - FACTORS INFLUENCING LATE RESULTS
    NEVELSTEEN, A
    SUY, R
    DAENEN, W
    BOEL, A
    STALPAERT, G
    SURGERY, 1980, 88 (05) : 642 - 653
  • [30] Grafting globe artichoke on four Tunisian cardoon rootstocks: compatibility and cardoon responses versus Verticillium dahliae
    Riahi, J.
    Nicoletto, C.
    Riahi, M.
    Laroussi, A.
    Abdelhak, F.
    Khalfallah, K. Kouki
    X INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ARTICHOKE, CARDOON AND THEIR WILD RELATIVES, 2020, 1284 : 137 - 143