Evaluating the carbon leakage effect on cement sector under different climate policies

被引:18
作者
Allevi, Elisabetta [1 ]
Oggioni, Giorgia [1 ]
Riccardi, Rossana [1 ]
Rocco, Marco
机构
[1] Univ Brescia, Dept Econ & Management, Via S Faustino 74-b, IT-25122 Brescia, Italy
关键词
Carbon leakage; Cement industry emissions; EU emissions trading system; Environmental policies; Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problem; INDUSTRY; COMPETITIVENESS; EMISSIONS; ABATEMENT; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.072
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European-Union Emissions Trading System (EU-ETS) is a cap and trade scheme that requires the industries participating in the program to obtain allowances to cover their carbon emissions. Energy Intensive Industries claim that this system puts their European plants at an economics disadvantage compared to facilities located outside the EU. As a direct consequence, industries may relocate their production activities in unregulated countries, leading to the so-called carbon leakage effect. In order to curb this effect, several policies have been devised, including grandfathering of CO2 allowances and border tax adjustment. This paper investigates the impact of these two policies on the cement sector, with a particular focus on the Italian market, particularly prone to carbon leakage. The analysis is based on an oligopolistic partial equilibrium model with a detailed technological representation of the market. The model is a Generalized Nash Equilibrium Problem that accounts for the interactions of cement companies. Simulations show that neither the grandfathering nor the border tax adjustment fully solve the carbon leakage problem because cement companies modify their cement and clinker trade strategies according to the measure applied in order to avoid or reduce their carbon costs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 337
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TACKL CARB LEAK SECT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Cement Technology Roadmap 2009 - Carbon emissions reductions up to 2050
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Complementarity Modeling in Energy Markets
[4]  
Boston Consulting Group, 2008, FOR MIGR GLOB ENV CH
[5]  
Boston Consulting Group, 2008, ASS IMP 2013 2020 ET
[6]   Reaping the carbon rent: Abatement and overallocation profits in the European cement industry, insights from an LMDI decomposition analysis [J].
Branger, Frederic ;
Quirion, Philippe .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 47 :189-205
[7]   Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies [J].
Branger, Frederic ;
Quirion, Philippe .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 99 :29-39
[8]  
Cembureau, 2010, ACT REP
[9]  
Cembureau, 1999, BEST AV TECHN CEM IN
[10]  
Cook G, 2011, INVESTMENT CARBON PR