Examining the Moderating Effects of Work Unit Size and Task Analyzability in the Relation Between Leader's Communication Style and Leader-Member Exchange

被引:0
作者
Brown, Ofelia [1 ]
Paz-Aparicio, Carmen [2 ]
机构
[1] ESAN Univ, Acad Dept Management, Lima, Peru
[2] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Inst Entrepreneurship & Family Business, Madrid, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
leader-member exchange theory (LMX); leader's communication style; work unit size; task analyzability; organizational communication; managerial communication; SUBORDINATE PERFORMANCE; JOB CHARACTERISTICS; MEDIATING ROLE; COMPLEXITY; BEHAVIOR; CONTEXT; LMX; SPAN; ORGANIZATION; SUBSTITUTES;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619060
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
There is a consensus regarding the impact of the leader's communication on the relationship with their followers and on the achievement of organizational outcomes. This study seeks to contribute to clarifying the impact that contextual factors have on the leader's communication in order to know how leaders should adjust their communication style, depending on the job characteristics, to build high quality relationships with their followers. Therefore, the current research examines the moderating role of two context factors in the effectiveness of leaders' communication in generating the leader-member relationship. Through a moderation analysis on a sample of 149 white-collar workers, this research study analyzes how work unit size and task analyzability interact regarding six dimensions of leader communication style in relation to LMX. Results suggest that the work unit size moderates the relationship between two dimensions of leader's communication style (preciseness and verbal aggressiveness) and LMX. Specifically, the positive effect of preciseness on LMX smooths as the work unit size increases. The negative effect of verbal aggressiveness on LMX becomes more intense as work unit size increases. Furthermore, task analyzability moderates the positive relationship between emotionality and LMX for low levels of task analyzability. As a result, this study contributes by deepening on why leaders' communicative behaviors can have favorable/unfavorable results in specific contexts and on how a leader can modulate his/her communication style according to the context, in order to improve the LMX. Implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Baker W., 1980, J BUS COMMUN, V17, P33, DOI DOI 10.1177/002194368001700304
[2]   The Incremental Validity of Communication Styles Over Personality Traits for Leader Outcomes [J].
Bakker-Pieper, Angelique ;
de Vries, Reinout E. .
HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2013, 26 (01) :1-19
[3]   Interpersonal communication skills that enhance organisational commitment [J].
Bambacas, Mary ;
Patrickson, Margaret .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT, 2008, 12 (01) :51-+
[4]   BEYOND CONTEXTUALIZATION: USING CONTEXT THEORIES TO NARROW THE MICRO-MACRO GAP IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH [J].
Bamberger, Peter .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 51 (05) :839-846
[5]   Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership [J].
Bass, BM ;
Avolio, BJ ;
Jung, DI ;
Berson, Y .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (02) :207-218
[6]   Defensive Communication and Burnout in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange [J].
Becker, Jennifer A. H. ;
Halbesleben, Jonathon R. B. ;
O'Hair, H. Dan .
COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2005, 22 (02) :143-150
[7]   Leader's communication style, LMX and organizational commitment A study of employee perceptions in Peru [J].
Brown, Ofelia ;
Paz-Aparicio, Carmen ;
Revilla, Antonio J. .
LEADERSHIP & ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (02) :230-258
[8]   TASK COMPLEXITY - A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS [J].
CAMPBELL, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1988, 13 (01) :40-52
[9]  
Campbell K.S., 2003, Journal of Business Communications, V40, P170, DOI [DOI 10.1177/002194360304000301, 10.1177/002194360304000301]
[10]   Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension [J].
Campion, MA ;
Papper, EM ;
Medsker, GJ .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (02) :429-452