Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams

被引:54
作者
Andersen, Peter Oluf [1 ,3 ]
Jensen, Michael Kammer [1 ]
Lippert, Anne [1 ,3 ]
Ostergaard, Doris [1 ,3 ]
Klausen, Tobias Wirenfelt [2 ]
机构
[1] Herlev Hosp, Danish Inst Med Simulat, DK-2730 Herlev, Capital Reg Den, Denmark
[2] Herlev Hosp, Dept Haematol, DK-2730 Herlev, Capital Reg Den, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Assessment; Cardiac arrest; Non-technical skills; Simulation; CREW RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; SKILLS; SIMULATION; QUALITY; DEFIBRILLATION; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.034
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background:Treating cardiac arrest is linked to the mutual performance of several health-care individuals' task coordination. Non-technical skills, including communication, leadership and team interaction, could improve sequencing the tasks in the cardiac arrest algorithm. Non-technical skills have been a part of crew resource management training, created to improve safety in aviation. This study aimed, first, to establish crew resource management and non-technical skill-based learning objectives and behavioural markers for the performance of multi-professional resuscitation teams: second, to develop a checklist and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the checklist: and, finally, to develop a simulation-based course including the checklist on behavioural markers, as a tool for learning and assessment. Method: A seven-step procedure was used. Findings from interviews with Advanced Life Support instructors and analysis of critical incidents were used to create learning objectives, assessment tools and course curriculum. Reliability and validity were tested by assessing digital versatile disc (DVD)-recorded simulated cardiac arrests. Results: A checklist with 22 behavioural markers based on nine learning objectives was developed and embedded in an 8-h full-scale simulation course. Inter-rater reliability of the checklist (intra-class correlation) was 0.9. Concurrent validity (intra-class correlation) was 0.93. Rate of agreement (0.58-0.91) and kappa values (0.03-0.82) on single items varied. Conclusion: A full-scale simulation course and a checklist with 22 behavioural markers were developed. Good inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the checklist were demonstrated. Single items on the checklist need refinement to improve accuracy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 711
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ABBAS G, 2006, ADV LIFE SUPPORT, P38
[2]   Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest [J].
Abella, BS ;
Alvarado, JP ;
Myklebust, H ;
Edelson, DP ;
Barry, A ;
O'Hearn, N ;
Vanden Hoek, TL ;
Becker, LB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (03) :305-310
[3]  
ANDERSEN P, 2009, TEAM TRAINING UNPUB
[4]   Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams [J].
Andersen, Peter Oluf ;
Jensen, Mtchael Kammer ;
Lippert, Anne ;
Ostergaard, Doris .
RESUSCITATION, 2010, 81 (06) :695-702
[5]  
ANDERSEN PO, 2009, CRITICAL INCIDENTS R
[6]  
Aufderheide Tom P, 2004, Crit Care Med, V32, pS345, DOI 10.1097/01.CCM.0000134335.46859.09
[7]   European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005 - Section 9. Principles of training in resuscitation [J].
Baskett, PJF ;
Nolan, JP ;
Handley, A ;
Soar, J ;
Biarent, D ;
Richmond, S .
RESUSCITATION, 2005, 67 :S181-S189
[8]   Summative Assessment in Medicine: The Promise of Simulation for High-stakes Evaluation [J].
Boulet, John R. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (11) :1017-1024
[9]   Education in resuscitation [J].
Chamberlain, DA ;
Hazinski, MF .
RESUSCITATION, 2003, 59 (01) :11-43
[10]  
*DED AS PAC, 2006, INT REP NAT RAIL RES, P55