Efficacy and safety of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for early medical abortion in an Australian clinical setting

被引:39
|
作者
Goldstone, Philip [1 ]
Walker, Clara [2 ]
Hawtin, Katherine [2 ]
机构
[1] Marie Stopes Int Australia, GPO Box 1635, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] MS Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
abortion; early medical abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone-buccal misoprostol; termination of pregnancy; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; VIETNAM;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.12608
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: In 2014, a composite pack containing mifepristone-buccal misoprostol, indicated for use to 63 days gestation replaced the existing regimen for early medical abortion (EMA) in Australia. Aims: To provide updated efficacy and safety information for the use of mifepristone-buccal misoprostol for EMA in Australia, and assess the effect of patient age and gestational age on efficacy. Materials and methods: Observational cohort study of 15 008 women attending one of 16 Marie Stopes International clinics in Australia for an EMA (gestational age <= 63 days) between 1 March 2013 and 30 September 2015. Administration of 200 mg oral mifepristone in-clinic was followed 24-48 h later by 800 mu g buccal misoprostol self-administered at home. Method success was defined as complete abortion not requiring surgical intervention. Results: Follow-up information was available for 87.14% (13 078/15 008) of women. Likelihood of follow-up was significantly lower for women from rural or remote locations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.47; P < 0.001). Medical abortion was successful in 95.16% (12 445/13 078) of women with follow-up. Higher patient and gestational ages were associated (P < 0.001) with a slight increase in method failure. There were 674 serious adverse events (5.15%), mainly due to method failure. Infection (15; 0.11%) and haemorrhage (17; 0.13%) were rare. One death was recorded (<0.01%); however, an association between EMA and cause of death, necrotising pneumonia, was not established. Conclusion: Mifepristone-buccal misoprostol is an effective and safe alternative to surgical termination of pregnancy up to 63 days gestation.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 371
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mifepristone followed on the same day by vaginal misoprostol for early abortion
    Pymar, HC
    Creinin, MD
    Schwartz, JL
    CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 64 (02) : 87 - 92
  • [22] Mifepristone and misoprostol for early medical abortion: 18 months experience in the United States
    Hausknecht, R
    CONTRACEPTION, 2003, 67 (06) : 463 - 465
  • [23] Mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion: Home administration of misoprostol in Guadeloupe
    Guengant, JP
    Bangou, J
    Elul, B
    Ellertson, C
    CONTRACEPTION, 1999, 60 (03) : 167 - 172
  • [24] Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Sober, Stephanie
    Ratcliffe, Sarah
    Creinin, Mitchell D.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (03) : 230 - 233
  • [25] Factors related to completeness of medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol
    Jiang, Wen-Xiao
    He, Fang-Fang
    Shen, Qi
    Tao, Xue-Jiao
    Zhao, Chu-Chu
    Shen, Zhao-Jun
    Zhu, Xue-Qiong
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 80 (02) : 96 - 102
  • [26] Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol
    Haimov-Kochman, Ronit
    Arbel, Revital
    Sciaky-Tamir, Yael
    Brzezinski, Amnon
    Laufer, Neri
    Yagel, Simcha
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (04) : 462 - 466
  • [27] Comparison or oral versus vaginal misoprostol & continued use of misoprostol after mifepristone for early medical abortion
    Mittal, S
    Agarwal, S
    Kumar, S
    Batra, A
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 122 (02) : 132 - 136
  • [28] Comparing two early medical abortion regimens: mifepristone plus misoprostol vs. misoprostol alone
    Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoca
    Blum, Jennifer
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Nguyen Thi Bach Nge
    Dabash, Rasha
    Diop, Ayisha
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (05) : 410 - 417
  • [29] Medical abortion by mifepristone with oral versus vaginal misoprostol
    Jyothi, Shetty
    Pallavi, M. N. V.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (06) : 529 - 531
  • [30] Effectiveness and Safety of Medical Abortion with Mifepristone and Sublingual Misoprostol up to 63 Days of Gestation
    Saengbanyang, Prakasit
    Wongwananuruk, Thanyarat
    Panichyawat, Nalinee
    Powell, Natchara Sukapatrittikul
    Parkpinyo, Nichamon
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 51 (10)