Assessment and Performance Evaluation of a Wind Turbine Power Output

被引:18
作者
Abolude, Akintayo Temiloluwa [1 ]
Zhou, Wen [2 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Guy Carpenter Asia Pacific Climate Impact Ctr, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
turbine power curve; effective power curve; estimation errors; power output fluctuations; MODELING TECHNIQUES; NEURAL-NETWORKS; HONG-KONG; ENERGY; GENERATION; PREDICTION; SPEED; FARM; TURBULENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/en11081992
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Estimation errors have constantly been a technology bother for wind power management, often time with deviations of actual power curve (APC) from the turbine power curve (TPC). Power output dispersion for an operational 800 kW turbine was analyzed using three averaging tine steps of 1-min, 5-min, and 15-min. The error between the APC and TPC in kWh was about 25% on average, irrespective of the time of the day, although higher magnitudes of error were observed during low wind speeds and poor wind conditions. The 15-min averaged time series proved more suitable for grid management and energy load scheduling, but the error margin was still a major concern. An effective power curve (EPC) based on the polynomial parametric wind turbine power curve modeling technique was calibrated using turbine and site-specific performance data. The EPC reduced estimation error to about 3% in the aforementioned time series during very good wind conditions. By integrating statistical wind speed forecasting methods and site-specific EPCs, wind power forecasting and management can be significantly improved without compromising grid stability.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A preliminary analysis of wind turbine energy yield [J].
Abolude, Akintayo ;
Zhou, Wen .
2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE ENERGY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2017, 138 :423-428
[2]  
Akinsanola A.A., 2017, J FUNDAM RENEW ENERG, V7, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4172/2090-4541.1000227, 10.4172/2090-4541.1000227]
[3]   Assessment of wind energy potential over Ontario and Great Lakes using the NARR data: 1980-2012 [J].
Ashtine, Masao ;
Bello, Richard ;
Higuchi, Kaz .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 56 :272-282
[4]   Statistical Diagnosis of the Best Weibull Methods for Wind Power Assessment for Agricultural Applications [J].
Azad, Abul Kalam ;
Rasul, Mohammad Golam ;
Yusaf, Talal .
ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (05) :3056-3085
[5]   Statistical analysis of wind power forecast error [J].
Bludszuweit, Hans ;
Antonio Dominguez-Navarro, Jose ;
Llombart, Andres .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (03) :983-991
[6]   Review of power curve modelling for wind turbines [J].
Carrillo, C. ;
Obando Montano, A. F. ;
Cidras, J. ;
Diaz-Dorado, E. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 :572-581
[7]   ARIMA-Based Time Series Model of Stochastic Wind Power Generation [J].
Chen, Peiyuan ;
Pedersen, Troels ;
Bak-Jensen, Birgitte ;
Chen, Zhe .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (02) :667-676
[8]   Performance characterisation of a commercial-scale wind turbine operating in an urban environment, using real data [J].
Cooney, Ciaran ;
Byrne, Raymond ;
Lyons, William ;
O'Rourke, Fergal .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 36 :44-54
[9]   A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity [J].
Doherty, R ;
O'Malley, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (02) :587-595
[10]   Current issues in wind energy meteorology [J].
Emeis, Stefan .
METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 21 (04) :803-819