The Effect of Psychological Contract Combined With Stress and Health on Employees' Management Behavior

被引:4
作者
Cheng, Yueyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Zunyi Med Univ, Dept Foreign Languages, Zhuhai Campus, Zunyi, Guizhou, Peoples R China
关键词
psychological contract; employee management; stress and health; FMRI; management behavior; SUB-HEALTH; WORK; BREACH; JOB; COMMITMENT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667302
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In order to effectively manage employees and improve their work enthusiasm, based on the theoretical basis of project team members' psychological contract, the status quo of employees' psychological contract, stress and health status are investigated and analyzed. The differences of employees' psychological contract are analyzed through the questionnaire. A total of 400 questionnaires are distributed and 365 are returned. The method of one-way ANOVA is used to study the psychological contract status of project members from four aspects: gender, education background, position level, and working years, and obtain the results of difference analysis in four aspects. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) is used to evaluate the work stress of employees. The results show that gender, education background, position level and working years have different effects on employees' psychological contract. Moreover, if employees continue to bear high-intensity work stress, a series of psychological and physical health problems will appear, such as difficulty in concentration. For enterprises, the poor psychological and physical conditions of employees will make the overall work inefficient and the working atmosphere dull. Therefore, enterprises should control employees' work stress within a reasonable range, and should not blindly impose high-intensity work stress on employees. This exploration demonstrates the way to realize the psychological contract construction of project team members, and targeted employee management countermeasures are put forward.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The Impact of Expatriates' Cross-Cultural Adjustment on Work Stress and Job Involvement in the High-Tech Industry [J].
Chen, Min .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[2]   Job insecurity and work outcomes: The role of psychological contract breach and positive psychological capital [J].
Costa, Sandra ;
Neves, Pedro .
WORK AND STRESS, 2017, 31 (04) :375-394
[3]  
Dietz, 2018, COLL STUDENT AFFAIRS, V36, P94, DOI [DOI 10.1353/CSJ.2018.0006, 10.1353/csj.2018.0006]
[4]   Impaired function of the intestinal barrier in a novel sub-health rat model [J].
Feng, Sisi ;
Liu, Weidong ;
Zuo, Shengnan ;
Xie, Tingyan ;
Deng, Hui ;
Zhang, Qiuhuan ;
Zhong, Baiyun .
MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2016, 13 (04) :3459-3465
[5]   The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement [J].
Gupta, Vishal ;
Agarwal, Upasna A. ;
Khatri, Naresh .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (11) :2806-2817
[6]   An integrative model of information security policy compliance with psychological contract: Examining a bilateral perspective [J].
Han, JinYoung ;
Kim, Yoo Jung ;
Kim, Hyungjin .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2017, 66 :52-65
[7]   The Multidimensional Benefits of University Student Volunteering: Psychological Contract, Expectations, and Outcomes [J].
Haski-Leventhal, Debbie ;
Paull, Megan ;
Young, Susan ;
MacCallum, Judith ;
Holmes, Kirsten ;
Omari, Maryam ;
Scott, Rowena ;
Alony, Irit .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2020, 49 (01) :113-133
[8]   Split-shift work in relation to stress, health and psychosocial work factors among bus drivers [J].
Ihlstrom, Jonas ;
Kecklund, Goran ;
Anund, Anna .
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2017, 56 (04) :531-538
[9]  
홍윤주, 2016, Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, V22, P187, DOI 10.20878/cshr.2016.22.7.015
[10]   Reciprocation wary employees discount psychological contract fulfillment [J].
Karagonlar, Gokhan ;
Eisenberger, Robert ;
Aselage, Justin .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2016, 37 (01) :23-40