Perioperative Dextromethorphan as an Adjunct for Postoperative Pain A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:44
作者
King, Michael R. [1 ,2 ]
Ladha, Karim S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gelineau, Amanda M. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, T. Anthony [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, 55 Fruit St GRJ 409, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, 55 Fruit St GRJ 409, Boston, MA USA
[3] Toronto Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ASPARTATE RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; DOSE ORAL DEXTROMETHORPHAN; DOUBLE-BLIND; MORPHINE CONSUMPTION; PREEMPTIVE ANALGESIA; OPIOID REQUIREMENT; EPIDURAL LIDOCAINE; BOWEL FUNCTION; PHANTOM PAIN;
D O I
10.1097/ALN.0000000000000950
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists have been shown to reduce perioperative pain and opioid use. The authors performed a meta-analysis to determine whether the use of perioperative dextromethorphan lowers opioid consumption or pain scores. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Pubget, and EMBASE were searched. Studies were included if they were randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials written in English, and performed on patients 12 yr or older. For comparison of opioid use, included studies tracked total consumption of IV or intramuscular opioids over 24 to 48 h. Pain score comparisons were performed at 1, 4 to 6, and 24 h postoperatively. Difference in means (MD) was used for effect size. Results: Forty studies were identified and 21 were eligible for one or more comparisons. In 848 patients from 14 trials, opioid consumption favored dextromethorphan (MD, -10.51 mg IV morphine equivalents; 95% CI, -16.48 to -4.53 mg; P = 0.0006). In 884 patients from 13 trials, pain at 1 h favored dextromethorphan (MD, -1.60; 95% CI, -1.89 to -1.31; P < 0.00001). In 950 patients from 13 trials, pain at 4 to 6 h favored dextromethorphan (MD, -0.89; 95% CI, -1.11 to -0.66; P < 0.00001). In 797 patients from 12 trials, pain at 24 h favored dextromethorphan (MD, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.24 to -0.60; P < 0.00001). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that dextromethorphan use perioperatively reduces the postoperative opioid consumption at 24 to 48 h and pain scores at 1, 4 to 6, and 24 h.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [21] Preoperative dextromethorphan reduces intraoperative but not postoperative morphine requirements after laparotomy
    Grace, RF
    Power, I
    Umedaly, H
    Zammit, A
    Mersiades, M
    Cousins, MJ
    Mather, LE
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (05) : 1135 - 1138
  • [22] The effect of the preemptive use of the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on postoperative analgesic requirements
    Helmy, SAK
    Bali, A
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (03) : 739 - 744
  • [23] Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    Deeks, JJ
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414): : 557 - 560
  • [24] HINSBERGER A, 1994, J PSYCHIATR NEUROSCI, V19, P375
  • [25] Katz NP, 2000, J PAIN SYMPTOM MANAG, V19, pS37
  • [26] Kawamata T, 1998, ANESTH ANALG, V86, P594
  • [27] Laskowski K, 2011, CAN J ANESTH, V58, P911, DOI 10.1007/s12630-011-9560-0
  • [28] Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees
    Lewis, S
    Clarke, M
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7300): : 1479 - 1480
  • [29] Premedication with dextromethorphan provides posthemorrhoidectomy pain relief
    Liu, ST
    Wu, CT
    Yeh, CC
    Ho, ST
    Wong, CS
    Jao, SW
    Wu, CC
    Kang, JC
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2000, 43 (04) : 507 - 510
  • [30] Intraoperative Ketamine Reduces Perioperative Opiate Consumption in Opiate-dependent Patients with Chronic Back Pain Undergoing Back Surgery
    Loftus, Randy W.
    Yeager, Mark P.
    Clark, Jeffrey A.
    Brown, Jeremiah R.
    Abdu, William A.
    Sengupta, Dilip K.
    Beach, Michael L.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 113 (03) : 639 - 646