Disruption of conditioned reward association by typical and atypical antipsychotics

被引:51
作者
Danna, C. L. [1 ]
Elmer, G. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Maryland Psychiat Res Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
关键词
Antipsychotic; Autoshape; Olanzapine; Haloperidol; Incentive salience; Goal-tracking; Sign-tracking; PAVLOVIAN APPROACH BEHAVIOR; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS CORE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS; DOPAMINE-D-2; RECEPTORS; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; BRAIN-STIMULATION; IN-VIVO; RATS; ANHEDONIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.pbb.2010.04.004
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Antipsychotic drugs are broadly classified into typical and atypical compounds: they vary in their pharmacological profile however a common component is their antagonist effects at the D2 dopamine receptors (DRD2). Unfortunately, diminished DRD2 activation is generally thought to be associated with the severity of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine and typical antipsychotic haloperidol in a paradigm that reflects the learned transfer of incentive motivational properties to previously neutral stimuli, namely autoshaping. In order to provide a dosing comparison to a therapeutically relevant endpoint, both drugs were tested against amphetamine-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition as well. In the autoshaping task, rats were exposed to repeated pairings of stimuli that were differentially predictive of reward delivery. Conditioned approach to the reward-predictive cue (sign-tracking) and to the reward (goal-tracking) increased during repeated pairings in the vehicle treated rats. Haloperidol and olanzapine completely abolished this behavior at relatively low doses (100 mu g/kg). This same dose was the threshold dose for each drug to antagonize the sensorimotor gating deficits produced by amphetamine. At lower doses (3-30 mu g/kg) both drugs produced a dose-dependent decrease in conditioned approach to the reward-predictive cue. There was no difference between drugs at this dose range which indicates that olanzapine disrupts autoshaping at a significantly lower proposed DRD2 receptor occupancy. Interestingly, neither drug disrupted conditioned approach to the reward at the same dose range that disrupted conditioned approach to the reward-predictive cue. Thus, haloperidol and olanzapine, at doses well below what is considered therapeutically relevant, disrupts the attribution of incentive motivational value to previously neutral cues. Drug effects on this dimension of reward processing are an important consideration in the development of future pharmacological treatments for schizophrenia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Impact of atypical antipsychotics on quality of life in patients with schizophrenia [J].
Awad, AG ;
Voruganti, LNP .
CNS DRUGS, 2004, 18 (13) :877-893
[2]   Pavlovian contingencies and temporal information [J].
Balsam, Peter D. ;
Fairhurst, Stephen ;
Gallistel, Charles R. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 2006, 32 (03) :284-294
[3]   The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience [J].
Berridge, Kent C. .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 191 (03) :391-431
[4]   DOPAMINE AND PREPARATORY BEHAVIOR .1. EFFECTS OF PIMOZIDE [J].
BLACKBURN, JR ;
PHILLIPS, AG ;
FIBIGER, HC .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1987, 101 (03) :352-360
[5]   AUTO-SHAPING OF PIGEONS KEY-PECK [J].
BROWN, PL ;
JENKINS, HM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1968, 11 (01) :1-&
[6]   Neurochemical evidence for antagonism by olanzapine of dopamine, serotonin, alpha(1)-adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in vivo in rats [J].
Bymaster, FP ;
HemrickLuecke, SK ;
Perry, KW ;
Fuller, RW .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 124 (1-2) :87-94
[7]   Time-limited modulation of appetitive Pavlovian memory by D1 and NMDA receptors in the nucleus accumbens [J].
Dalley, JW ;
Lääne, K ;
Theobald, DEH ;
Armstrong, HC ;
Corlett, PR ;
Chudasama, Y ;
Robbins, TW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (17) :6189-6194
[8]   Nucleus accumbens dopamine and discriminated approach learning: interactive effects of 6-hydroxydopamine lesions and systemic apomorphine administration [J].
Dalley, JW ;
Chudasama, Y ;
Theobald, DE ;
Pettifer, CL ;
Fletcher, CM ;
Robbins, TW .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 161 (04) :425-433
[9]   Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens [J].
Day, Jeremy J. ;
Roitman, Mitchell F. ;
Wightman, R. Mark ;
Carelli, Regina M. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 10 (08) :1020-1028
[10]   Differential involvement of NMDA, AMPA/kainate, and dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens core in the acquisition and performance of Pavlovian approach behavior [J].
Di Ciano, P ;
Cardinal, RN ;
Cowell, RA ;
Little, SJ ;
Everitt, BJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 21 (23) :9471-9477