FDG-PET/CT to predict optimal primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: preliminary results

被引:16
作者
Alessi, Alessandra [1 ]
Martinelli, Fabio [2 ]
Padovano, Barbara [1 ]
Serafini, Gianluca [1 ]
Lorusso, Domenica [2 ]
Lorenzoni, Alice [1 ]
Ditto, Antonino [2 ]
Lecce, Francesca [2 ]
Mira, Marta [1 ]
Donfrancesco, Cristina [2 ]
Raspagliesi, Francesco [2 ]
Crippa, Flavio [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Nucl Med & PET Unit, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Gynecol Oncol Unit, Milan, Italy
关键词
FDG-PET/CT; Ovarian cancer; Primary cytoreduction surgery; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE; CHEMOTHERAPY; METAANALYSIS; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; MASS;
D O I
10.5301/tj.5000396
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims and background: Primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has a significant impact on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patient selection is important to recognize factors limiting optimal CRS and to avoid unnecessary aggressive surgical procedures. We evaluated the contribution of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in the presurgical identification of disease sites that may preclude EOC cytoreducibility. Methods: Patients with suspected EOC underwent F-18-FDG-PET/CT within 20 days before debulking surgery. The PET/CT results were compared with surgical findings and postsurgery histopathology in order to assess the diagnostic value. Results: Between August 2013 and January 2014, 29 patients were evaluated. The histopathology showed 23 EOC and 6 benign tumors. The FDG-PET/CT was positive (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] 11.3 +/- 5.4) in 21/23 (91%) patients with EOC and provided 2 false-negatives (1 mucinous and 1 clear cell carcinoma; SUVmax <= 2.8). The FDG-PET/CT was true-negative (SUVmax 2.2 +/- 1.6) in 4 out of 6 patients (67%). False-positive FDG-PET results were obtained in 2 cellular fibromas (SUVmax 4.8 and 5.6). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT to characterize ovarian masses were 91%, 67%, and 86%, respectively. Among the 21 FDG-PET/CT-positive EOC, we detected factors limiting optimal CRS in 6 cases (29%): 4 hepatic hilum infiltration and 2 root mesentery involvement, confirmed at surgical exploration. The FDG-PET did not find limiting factors in the remaining 15 patients (71%) in whom optimal CRS was obtained. Conclusions: Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT shows high sensitivity but suboptimal specificity in the characterization of ovarian masses. However, PET/CT may play a role in noninvasively selecting patients with EOC who can benefit from primary CRS.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis of primary ovarian cancer
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Suzuki, Kayo
    Senda, Michio
    Kita, Masato
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    Onishi, Yumiko
    Maeda, Tetsuo
    Yoshikawa, Takeshi
    Ohno, Yoshiharu
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2011, 32 (07) : 549 - 553
  • [2] Present and future of FDG-PET/CT in ovarian cancer
    Kitajima, Kazuhiro
    Murakami, Koji
    Sakamoto, Setsu
    Kaji, Yasushi
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (03) : 155 - 164
  • [3] FDG-PET/CT as a molecular biomarker in ovarian cancer
    Nowosinska, Ewa
    Avril, Stefanie
    Murray, Iain
    Szyszko, Teresa
    Avril, Norbert
    CANCER BIOMARKERS, 2010, 8 (4-5) : 167 - 175
  • [4] Role of reactive thrombocytosis after primary cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Kim, Myeong-Seon
    Baek, Seung Hun
    Noh, Joseph J.
    Shim, Jung In
    Kang, Jun Hyeok
    Jeong, Soo Young
    Choi, Chel Hun
    Kim, Tae-Joong
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Lee, Yoo-Young
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [5] Development and Validation of 18F-FDG PET/CT-Based Models for Predicting Successful Complete Cytoreduction During Primary Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian cancer
    Kim, Junhwan
    Gil, Joonhyung
    Kim, Se Ik
    Hwangbo, Suhyun
    Noh, Joseph J. J.
    Lee, Jeong-Won
    Cheon, Gi Jeong
    Kim, Jae-Weon
    Cho, Young Seok
    Lee, Maria
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (02) : E51 - E59
  • [6] Present and future of FDG-PET/CT in ovarian cancer
    Kazuhiro Kitajima
    Koji Murakami
    Setsu Sakamoto
    Yasushi Kaji
    Kazuro Sugimura
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2011, 25 : 155 - 164
  • [7] A systematic review on the role of FDG-PET/CT in tumour delineation and radiotherapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer
    Muijs, Christina T.
    Beukema, Jannet C.
    Pruim, Jan
    Mul, Veronique E.
    Groen, Henk
    Plukker, John Th.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 97 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [8] Early Postoperative CT as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients With Advanced Ovarian, Tubal, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer Deemed Optimally Debulked at Primary Cytoreductive Surgery
    Lakhman, Yulia
    Akin, Oguz
    Sohn, Michael J.
    Zheng, Junting
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Iyer, Revathy B.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    Sabbatini, Paul J.
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Hricak, Hedvig
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (06) : 1453 - 1459
  • [9] High impact of FDG-PET/CT in diagnostic strategies for ovarian cancer
    Zytoon, Ashraf Anas
    Murakami, Koji
    Eid, Hazem
    El-Gammal, Mahmoud
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (03) : 340 - 348
  • [10] Laparoscopy to Predict the Result of Primary Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rutten, Marianne J.
    van Meurs, Hannah S.
    van de Vrie, Roelien
    Gaarenstroom, Katja N.
    Naaktgeboren, Christiana A.
    van Gorp, Toon
    Ter Brugge, Henk G.
    Hofhuis, Ward
    Schreuder, Henk W. R.
    Arts, Henriette J. G.
    Zusterzeel, Petra L. M.
    Pijnenborg, Johanna M. A.
    van Haaften, Maarten
    Fons, Guus
    Engelen, Mirjam J. A.
    Boss, Erik A.
    Vos, M. Caroline
    Gerestein, Kees G.
    Schutter, Eltjo M. J.
    Opmeer, Brent C.
    Spijkerboer, Anje M.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Mol, Ben Willem
    Kenter, Gemma G.
    Buist, Marrije R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06) : 613 - +