Why and how to engage expert stakeholders in ontology development: insights from social and behavioural sciences

被引:12
作者
Norris, Emma [1 ,2 ]
Hastings, Janna [2 ]
Marques, Marta M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mutlu, Ailbhe N. Finnerty [2 ]
Zink, Silje [2 ,5 ]
Michie, Susan [2 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Hlth Behav Change Res Grp, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[2] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, London, England
[3] Trinity Coll Dublin, ADAPT SFI Res Ctr, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Trinity Coll Dublin, Trinity Ctr Practice & Healthcare Innovat, Dublin, Ireland
[5] Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Rehabil Rheumatol, Oslo, Norway
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Stakeholders; Ontology development; Feedback; Social sciences; REDUCING WASTE; NIH SCIENCE; CLASSIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1186/s13326-021-00240-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Incorporating the feedback of expert stakeholders in ontology development is important to ensure content is appropriate, comprehensive, meets community needs and is interoperable with other ontologies and classification systems. However, domain experts are often not formally engaged in ontology development, and there is little available guidance on how this involvement should best be conducted and managed. Social and behavioural science studies often involve expert feedback in the development of tools and classification systems but have had little engagement with ontology development. This paper aims to (i) demonstrate how expert feedback can enhance ontology development, and (ii) provide practical recommendations on how to conduct expert feedback in ontology development using methodologies from the social and behavioural sciences. Main body Considerations for selecting methods for engaging stakeholders are presented. Mailing lists and issue trackers as existing methods used frequently in ontology development are discussed. Advisory boards and working groups, feedback tasks, consensus exercises, discussions and workshops are presented as potential methods from social and behavioural sciences to incorporate in ontology development. Conclusions A variety of methods from the social and behavioural sciences exist to enable feedback from expert stakeholders in ontology development. Engaging domain experts in ontology development enables depth and clarity in ontology development, whilst also establishing advocates for an ontology upon its completion.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Commentary: National Institutes of Health (NIH) Science of Behavior Change (SOBC) [J].
Aklin, Will M. ;
Stoeckel, Luke E. ;
Green, Paige A. ;
Keller, Chandra ;
King, Jonathan W. ;
Nielsen, Lisbeth ;
Hunter, Christine .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 14 (01) :193-198
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Ontology Engineering. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology, DOI DOI 10.2200/S00834ED1V01Y201802WBE018
[3]  
[Anonymous], IMPLEMENT SCI
[4]  
Arp R, 2015, BUILDING ONTOLOGIES WITH BASIC FORMAL ONTOLOGY, P1, DOI 10.7551/mitpress/9780262527811.001.0001
[5]   How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement [J].
Boaz, Annette ;
Hanney, Stephen ;
Borst, Robert ;
O'Shea, Alison ;
Kok, Maarten .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
[6]   An international, Delphi consensus study to identify priorities for methodological research in behavioral trials in health research [J].
Byrne, Molly ;
McSharry, Jenny ;
Meade, Oonagh ;
Lavoie, Kim L. ;
Bacon, Simon L. .
TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
[7]   Gaps and priorities in advancing methods for health behaviour change research [J].
Byrne, Molly .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 14 (01) :165-175
[8]   Links Between Behavior Change Techniques and Mechanisms of Action: An Expert Consensus Study [J].
Connell, Lauren E. ;
Carey, Rachel N. ;
de Bruin, Marijn ;
Rothman, Alexander J. ;
Johnston, Marie ;
Kelly, Michael P. ;
Michie, Susan .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 (08) :708-720
[9]  
Connor DB, 2020, RES PRIORITIES COVID
[10]   Controlled vocabularies and semantics in systems biology [J].
Courtot, Melanie ;
Juty, Nick ;
Knuepfer, Christian ;
Waltemath, Dagmar ;
Zhukova, Anna ;
Draeger, Andreas ;
Dumontier, Michel ;
Finney, Andrew ;
Golebiewski, Martin ;
Hastings, Janna ;
Hoops, Stefan ;
Keating, Sarah ;
Kell, Douglas B. ;
Kerrien, Samuel ;
Lawson, James ;
Lister, Allyson ;
Lu, James ;
Machne, Rainer ;
Mendes, Pedro ;
Pocock, Matthew ;
Rodriguez, Nicolas ;
Villeger, Alice ;
Wilkinson, Darren J. ;
Wimalaratne, Sarala ;
Laibe, Camille ;
Hucka, Michael ;
Le Novere, Nicolas .
MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2011, 7