Morphology of the Mesorectum in Patients with Primary Rectal Cancer

被引:29
作者
Boyle, Kirsten M. [1 ]
Chalmers, Alan G. [2 ]
Finan, Paul J. [3 ]
Sagar, Peter M. [3 ]
Burke, Dermot [3 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Colorectal Surg, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
[2] Gen Infirm, Dept Radiol, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Gen Infirm, John Goligher Dept Colorectal Surg, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Rectal cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gender; Body mass index; Resection margin; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT; RESECTION MARGIN; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; EXCISION; CARCINOMA; SURGERY; FASCIA; VOLUME; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819ef62f
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PURPOSE: The size and contents of the pelvis differ between the genders, and this may affect mesorectal size and shape. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to examine radiologically the applied anatomy of the mesorectum. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients (35 male, 23 female) with primary rectal cancer who had suitable high-resolution staging pelvic magnetic resonance images between November 2002 and July 2004 were studied. Ten variables of mesorectal morphology were measured on axial images at the ischial spines. The associations between morphologic variables and gender and body mass index were examined. RESULTS: Compared with female patients, male patients had a larger area of overall mesorectal package (3,776 mm(2) vs. 2,772 mm(2), P = 0.001), larger area of mesorectal fat (2,562mm(2) vs. 1,842mm(2), P = 0.001), and higher ratio of anteroposterior to transverse diameter of the mesorectal package (0.82 vs. 0.56, P < 0.001). The anterior mesorectal fat buffer was significantly thinner in females than in males (2.9 mm vs. 7.8 mm, P < 0.001). Mesorectal fat area was greater in males with a body mass index > 25 than with a body mass index < 25. CONCLUSIONS: Males have a larger overall mesorectal package compared with females, mainly caused by mesorectal fat. The anterior mesorectal fat is significantly thinner in females than in males. Such morphologic differences may affect resection margin status.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1129
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
ADAM, IJ ;
MOHAMDEE, MO ;
MARTIN, IG ;
SCOTT, N ;
FINAN, PJ ;
JOHNSTON, D ;
DIXON, MF ;
QUIRKE, P .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) :707-711
[2]   Variation of mesorectal volume with abdominal fat volume in patients with rectal carcinoma: assessment with MRI [J].
Allen, S. D. ;
Gada, V. ;
Blunt, D. M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 80 (952) :242-247
[3]   Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL ;
Vliegen, RFA ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Van Boven, H ;
De Bruine, A ;
von Meyenfeldt, MF ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) :497-504
[4]   Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Birbeck, KF ;
Macklin, CP ;
Tiffin, NJ ;
Parsons, W ;
Dixon, MF ;
Mapstone, NP ;
Abbott, CR ;
Scott, N ;
Finan, PJ ;
Johnston, D ;
Quirke, P .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) :449-457
[5]   Identification of the fascia propria by magnetic resonance imaging and its relevance to preoperative assessment of rectal cancer [J].
Bissett, IP ;
Fernando, CC ;
Hough, DM ;
Cowan, BR ;
Chau, KY ;
Young, AA ;
Parry, BR ;
Hill, GL .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (02) :259-265
[6]   Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen [J].
Blomqvist, L ;
Rubio, C ;
Holm, T ;
Machado, M ;
Hindmarsh, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (853) :18-23
[7]  
Botterill I D, 2001, Colorectal Dis, V3, P295, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2001.00258.x
[8]   Rectal carcinoma: Thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients [J].
Brown, G ;
Richards, CJ ;
Newcombe, RG ;
Dallimore, NS ;
Radcliffe, AG ;
Carey, DP ;
Bourne, MW ;
Williams, GT .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) :215-222
[9]   Prognostic significance of radial margins of clearance in rectal cancer [J].
deHaasKock, DFM ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
Jager, JJ ;
Langendijk, JA ;
Schouten, LJ ;
Volovics, A ;
Arends, JW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (06) :781-785
[10]   Rectal cancer - The Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997 [J].
Heald, RJ ;
Moran, BJ ;
Ryall, RDH ;
Sexton, R ;
MacFarlane, JK .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (08) :894-898