Governmentalities of mobility: The role of housing in the governance of Australian rural mobilities

被引:20
作者
Dufty-Jones, Rae [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Social Sci & Psychol, Penrith Sth Dc, NSW 2757, Australia
关键词
Housing policy; Rural governance; Regional development; Politics of mobility; Governmentality; Australia; 2ND HOMES; COMMUNITY-DEVELOPMENT; LOCAL SPACES; MIGRATION; PERSPECTIVES; PROVISION; POLICY; POWER; HOMELESSNESS; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.011
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
While mobility has long been recognised to be a core dynamic affecting the consumption of rural housing very little is known about the politics that exist around the connections between mobility and rural housing. To investigate how mobility informs policy approaches to rural housing in Australia this paper brings together the concepts of the politics of mobility and governmentality. Through a case study examining housing policy discourses relating to rural and regional Australia from 1985 to 2000, this paper analyses the way in which various governmentalities of mobility have infused Australian rural housing policy. The paper finds that, during this period, mobility was an important governmental rationality informing Australian regional development and rural housing policies. This study contributes to the critical engagement with the mobility turn in contemporary rural studies by showing that a particular dimension of the mobility turn the politics of mobility can be augmented through the application of governmentality theory. Such an analytical approach enables a critical assessment of how such governmentalities of mobility contribute to constructions of the rural as problematic and the implications of such representations for rural regions and communities. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 78
页数:16
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]  
Adey P, 2009, KEY IDEAS GEOGR, P1
[2]   Mobilities, meetings, and futures: an interview with John Urry [J].
Adey, Peter ;
Bissell, David ;
Urry, John .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING D-SOCIETY & SPACE, 2010, 28 (01) :1-16
[3]  
[Anonymous], ASPECTS OF TOURISM
[4]  
Argent N., 2000, AUSTR GEOGRAPHICAL S, V38, P182, DOI [10.1111/1467-8470.00110, DOI 10.1111/1467-8470.00110]
[5]  
Argent N., 2006, INT PERSPECTIVES RUR, P208
[6]   The Neoliberal Seduction: Governing-at-a-Distance, Community Development and the Battle over Financial Services Provision in Australia [J].
Argent, Neil .
GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (01) :29-39
[7]   Trouble in Paradise? Governing Australia's multifunctional rural landscapes [J].
Argent, Neil .
AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 2011, 42 (02) :183-205
[8]   What's New about Rural Governance? Australian perspectives and introduction to the special issue [J].
Argent, Neil .
AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHER, 2011, 42 (02) :95-103
[9]   Governmobility: The Powers of Mobility [J].
Baerenholdt, Jorgen Ole .
MOBILITIES, 2013, 8 (01) :20-34
[10]   THE CASE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT INTERVENTION: PLACE-BASED VERSUS PLACE-NEUTRAL APPROACHES [J].
Barca, Fabrizio ;
McCann, Philip ;
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres .
JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (01) :134-152