An Overview of Models for Business Process Analysis - Beyond Performance Measurement with KPIs

被引:1
作者
Pidun, Tim [1 ]
Felden, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] TU Bergakad Freiberg, Chair Informat Sci, Freiberg, Germany
来源
2010 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (EDOCW 2010) | 2010年
关键词
PMS; Process Performance; KPI; Success Factors; Ontologies; MEASUREMENT SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/EDOCW.2010.48
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Almost all of today's performance measurement systems (PMS) rely on the usage of numeric indicators to quantify success or failure, normally referred to as key performance indicators (KPIs). This restriction makes it difficult to describe hard-measurable or business processes that are rather qualitative in nature. So, other existing models for process analysis containing convenient solutions and indicators have to be assessed and validated in order to offer them to stakeholders to thoroughly assess business processes. In this article, various existing models and frameworks for performance measurement were reviewed in an empirical investigation, categorized in systems and put into context to relevant theories. The result of the research is an overview of models for business process analysis that also incorporates indirect process performance aspects like soft goals, complexity, maturity or dependencies.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
2CG Ltd, 2009, BAL SCOR US SURV 200
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, THEORY FIRM MANAGERI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, MANAG ACCOUNT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, IND MARKET MANAG, DOI DOI 10.1016/0019-8501(82)90025-6
[5]  
[Anonymous], ROLE RESPONSIBILITY
[6]  
Baetge J., 2008, BEST PRACTICES BEI S
[7]  
Bloch M., 2009, MCKINSEY BUSINESS TE
[8]  
Bucher T., 2007, EORGANISATION SERVIC, V1, P695
[9]  
Denyer D., 2009, The Sage handbook of organizational research methods, P671
[10]  
Dixon J.R., 1990, NEW PERFORMANCE CHAL