Using a sustainability index to assess energy technologies for rural electrification

被引:91
作者
Mainali, Brijesh [1 ]
Silveira, Semida [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Energy & Climate Studies Div, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Energy technology sustainability index; Indicators; Composite indicators; Principal component analysis; Electrification; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; DECISION-MAKING; INDICATORS; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; SYSTEMS; ACCESS; CONSTRUCTION; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a method for evaluating the sustainability performance of energy technologies applied in rural electrification, using the multivariate technique called Principal component analysis (PCA).The sustainability is assessed in terms of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). The ETSI has been used for assessing the sustainability performance of ten different energy systems in the case of India. Since this method is static in nature, the sustainability performance analysis is made for three different years (2005, 2010 and 2015) to capture technological advancements and changes in market conditions for the various technologies over time. The result shows that mature technologies such as biomass gasifiers, biogas and microhydro technologies have relatively better sustainability performance among the options analyzed. There is slight increment in their sustainability performance in the ten year period considered. Emerging technologies such as solar and wind have fairly good improvement in the sustainability performance over the studied time but still have difficulties competing with the mature technologies and conventional technologies without policy support. Analysis has been made with probable, minimum and maximum capital costs, operational and fuel costs to capture uncertainty among the input assumptions, and sensitivity has been reflected in the analysis of energy technology sustainability index (ETSI). This ETSI could help improve energy technology assessments, particularly when it comes to the feasibility of available alternatives. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1365
页数:15
相关论文
共 108 条
[72]   Energy indicators for tracking sustainability in developing countries [J].
Kemmler, Andreas ;
Spreng, Daniel .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (04) :2466-2480
[73]   A comparison of the sustainability of public and private transportation systems: Study of the Greater Toronto Area [J].
Kennedy, CA .
TRANSPORTATION, 2002, 29 (04) :459-493
[74]  
Lhendup T., 2008, Energy Sustain. Dev, V12, P13
[75]   A PCA-based method for construction of composite sustainability indicators [J].
Li, Tao ;
Zhang, Hongchao ;
Yuan, Chris ;
Liu, Zhichao ;
Fan, Chengcheng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (05) :593-603
[76]   New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria [J].
Madlener, Reinhard ;
Kowalski, Katharina ;
Stagl, Sigrid .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (12) :6060-6074
[77]   Evaluation of various energy devices for domestic lighting in India: Technology, economics and CO2 emissions [J].
Mahapatra, Sadhan ;
Chanakya, H. N. ;
Dasappa, S. .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 13 (04) :271-279
[78]  
Mahat I., 2004, Energy for Sustainable Development, V8, P9, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60455-X
[79]   Assessing rural energy sustainability in developing countries [J].
Mainali, Brijesh ;
Pachauri, Shonali ;
Rao, Narasimha D. ;
Silveira, Semida .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 19 :15-28
[80]   Alternative pathways for providing access to electricity in developing countries [J].
Mainali, Brijesh ;
Silveira, Semida .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 57 :299-310