Biophysical response of young pomegranate trees to surface and sub-surface drip irrigation and deficit irrigation

被引:35
|
作者
Zhang, Huihui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
Ayars, James E. [1 ]
Phene, Claude J. [3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, San Joaquin Valley Agr Sci Ctr, 9611 South Riverbend Ave, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, Ctr Agr Resources Res, 2150 Ctr Ave,Bldg D, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[3] SDI, POB 314, Clovis, CA 93613 USA
关键词
WATER; YIELD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; TEMPERATURE; STRESS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00271-017-0551-y
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Due to recurring agricultural water shortages, many farmers are looking for crops such as pomegranate that have both some degree of drought resistance and a higher economic value. To manage limited water effectively, it is necessary to know how pomegranate trees respond to varying levels of applied water and the type of irrigation system used. This study was conducted in experimental orchards located at the University of California Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension (UC KARE) Center and the USDA-ARS San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center in Parlier, California. The impact of surface drip (DI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) at the UC KARE orchard and irrigation levels (35, 50, 75, 100% of crop water use) at the USDA-ARS orchard on tree canopy size [fractional canopy ground cover (f(c)), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference infrared index (NDII)], canopy-to-air temperature difference, and fruit yield was determined during the 2012-2014 growing seasons. There was no difference in tree canopy size between the DI and SDI systems at the UC KARE site; but trees under SDI produced larger fruit in 2013 and higher yield whilst saving about 10% of water application. The difference in water application highlights an advantage of SDI over DI systems to conserve water without creating negative impacts on tree size or yield. At the USDA-ARS site, the 35 and 50% irrigation treatments significantly reduced tree canopy size in 2013 and 2014, compared to the 75 and 100% irrigation treatments. In 2014, trees irrigated with 75% of crop water use produced more yield than trees irrigated at 35% of crop water use. Furthermore, NDVI and NDII were correlated to f(c). The relationships between NDVI to f(c) and f(c) to pomegranate crop coefficient were established. The derived crop coefficient from ground-based remotely sensed data may potentially be used as a tool by farmers and water managers to estimate pomegranate tree water use on a field or regional scale using aerial or satellite imagery.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 435
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Water Use Efficiency of Surface Drip Irrigation versus an Alternative Subsurface Drip Irrigation Method
    Martinez, J.
    Reca, J.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (10)
  • [22] Wet bulb dimensions in surface drip irrigation
    Maia, Celsemy Eleuterio
    Aguilar Levien, Sergio Luiz
    de Medeiros, Jose Francismar
    Dantas Neto, Jose
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2010, 41 (01): : 149 - 158
  • [23] Yield and water productivity response of quinoa to various deficit irrigation regimes applied with surface and subsurface drip systems
    Colak, Y. Bozkurt
    Yazar, A.
    Alghory, A.
    Tekin, S.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2021, 159 (1-2) : 116 - 127
  • [24] Assessment of yield and water productivity of clementine trees under surface and subsurface drip irrigation
    Martinez-Gimeno, M. A.
    Bonet, L.
    Provenzano, G.
    Badal, E.
    Intriglioloa, D. S.
    Ballester, C.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 : 209 - 216
  • [25] Evaluation of nitrate redistribution in surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems
    Arab, Sogand
    Mozaffari, Javad
    Nahvinia, Mohammad Javad
    WATER SA, 2022, 48 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [26] Efficacy of subsurface and surface drip irrigation regarding water productivity and yield of maize
    Muneer, Muhammad Ansir
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Shahid, Muhammad Adnan
    Anwar-ul-Haq, Muhammad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2022, 59 (01): : 125 - 134
  • [27] Effects of combined drip irrigation and sub-surface pipe drainage on water and salt transport of saline-alkali soil in Xinjiang, China
    Heng Tong
    Liao Renkuan
    Wang Zhenhua
    Wu Wenyong
    Li Wenhao
    Zhang Jinzhu
    JOURNAL OF ARID LAND, 2018, 10 (06) : 932 - 945
  • [28] Assessment of emitter clogging with multiple fouling and root intrusion in sub-surface drip irrigation during 5-year sugarcane growth
    Muhammad, Tahir
    Zhou, Bo
    Puig-Bargues, Jaume
    Ding, Can
    Li, Shuqin
    Manan, Irum
    Zhou, Yunpeng
    Liu, Zeyuan
    Li, Yunkai
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 274
  • [29] Effects of mulching and sub-surface irrigation on vine growth, berry sugar content and water use of grapevines
    Zhang, Qingtao
    Wang, Shiping
    Li, Li
    Inoue, Mitsuhiro
    Xiang, Jiao
    Qiu, Guoyu
    Jin, Wenbiao
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2014, 143 : 1 - 8
  • [30] Response of early-peach [Prunus persica (L.)] trees to deficit irrigation
    Abrisqueta, I.
    Tapia, L. M.
    Conejero, W.
    Sanchez-Toribio, M. I.
    Abrisqueta, J. M.
    Vera, J.
    Ruiz-Sanchez, M. C.
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2010, 8 : S30 - S39