Evaluation of methods for estimating soil carbon dioxide efflux across a gradient of forest disturbance

被引:15
|
作者
Sullivan, B. W. [1 ]
Dore, S. [1 ]
Kolb, T. E. [1 ,2 ]
Hart, S. C. [3 ,4 ]
Montes-Helu, M. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] No Arizona Univ, Merriam Powell Ctr Environm Res, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[3] Univ Calif Merced, Sch Nat Sci, Merced, CA 95344 USA
[4] Univ Calif Merced, Sierra Nevada Res Inst, Merced, CA 95344 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
disturbance gradient; eddy covariance; Pinus ponderosa; soil CO(2) efflux; soil diffusion profile; soil respiration; PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS; STAND-REPLACING FIRE; CO2; EFFLUX; CHAMBER METHODS; IN-SITU; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; BOREAL FOREST; SIERRA-NEVADA; WATER CONTENT; MIXED FOREST;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02139.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Better understanding of variation in soil carbon dioxide (CO(2)) efflux caused by measurement techniques is needed, especially over gradients of site disturbance, to accurately estimate the global carbon cycle. We present soil CO(2) efflux data from a gradient of disturbance to ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa C. Lawson var. scopulorum Engelm.) forests in northern Arizona, USA that were obtained using four different techniques: vented static chambers, a Licor 6400-09, and soil CO(2) diffusion profiles using two different models (Moldrup, Millington-Quirk) to estimate soil gas diffusivity. We also compared soil CO(2) efflux measured by the Moldrup and Millington-Quirk diffusion profile methods to nighttime total ecosystem respiration (TER) data from an eddy covariance tower. We addressed four questions: (1) Does the use of a given method to measure soil CO(2) efflux bias results across a disturbance gradient? (2) Does the magnitude of difference between observed and modeled estimates of soil CO(2) differ between methods and across sites? (3) What is the spatial variability of each method at each site? (4) Which method is closest to the estimate of TER measured by the eddy covariance tower? Although soil CO(2) efflux varied significantly among methods the differences were consistent among sites. Measured and modeled total growing season fluxes were generally higher for the Licor 6400-09 and Millington-Quirk diffusion gradient methods compared with static chamber and the Moldrup diffusion gradient methods. A power analysis showed that the larger static chamber was the most efficient method at sampling spatial variation in soil CO(2) efflux. Nighttime measurements of soil CO(2) efflux from the Moldrup diffusion gradient method were most strongly related to nighttime TER assessed with eddy covariance. The use of a single, well-implemented method to measure soil CO(2) efflux is unlikely to create bias in comparisons across a gradient of forest disturbance.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2460
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of soil carbon dioxide efflux from contrasting land uses in a semi-arid savannah ecosystem, northeastern Ghana (West Africa)
    Owusu-Prempeh, Nat
    Amekudzi, Leonard K.
    Kyereh, Boateng
    SCIENTIFIC AFRICAN, 2024, 26
  • [32] Carbon dioxide exchange of a larch forest after a typhoon disturbance
    Sano, Tomohito
    Hirano, Takashi
    Liang, Naishen
    Hirata, Ryuichi
    Fujinuma, Yasumi
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 260 (12) : 2214 - 2223
  • [33] Evaluation of Five Gas Diffusion Models Used in the Gradient Method for Estimating CO2 Flux with Changing Soil Properties
    Yan, Xiaofei
    Guo, Qinxin
    Zhao, Yajie
    Zhao, Yandong
    Lin, Jianhui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [34] Soil carbon dioxide fluxes in a mixed floodplain forest in the Czech Republic
    Acosta, Manuel
    Darenova, Eva
    Dusek, Jiri
    Pavelka, Marian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL BIOLOGY, 2017, 82 : 35 - 42
  • [35] Carbon accumulation in loblolly pine plantations is increased by fertilization across a soil moisture availability gradient
    Bracho, Rosvel
    Vogel, Jason G.
    Will, Rodney E.
    Noormets, Asko
    Samuelson, Lisa J.
    Jokela, Eric J.
    Gonzalez-Benecke, Carlos A.
    Gezan, Salvador A.
    Markewitz, Daniel
    Seiler, John R.
    Strahm, Brian D.
    Teskey, Robert O.
    Fox, Thomas R.
    Kane, Michael B.
    Laviner, Marshall A.
    McElligot, Kristin M.
    Yang, Jinyan
    Lin, Wen
    Meek, Cassandra R.
    Cucinella, Joshua
    Akers, Madison K.
    Martin, Timothy A.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 424 : 39 - 52
  • [36] Interactive effects of soil nitrogen and atmospheric carbon dioxide on root/rhizosphere carbon dioxide efflux from loblolly and ponderosa pine seedlings
    Griffin, KL
    Bashkin, MA
    Thomas, RB
    Strain, BR
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1997, 190 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [37] Estimating annual carbon dioxide eddy fluxes using open-path analysers for cold forest sites
    Amiro, Brian
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2010, 150 (10) : 1366 - 1372
  • [38] Soil carbon dioxide efflux in pure and mixed stands of oak and beech
    Jonard, Mathieu
    Andre, Frederic
    Jonard, Francois
    Mouton, Nicolas
    Proces, Pierre
    Ponette, Quentin
    ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2007, 64 (02) : 141 - 150
  • [39] Effects of irrigation and plowing on soil carbon dioxide efflux in a poplar plantation chronosequence in northwest China
    Yan, Meifang
    Zhang, Xinshi
    Jiang, Yuan
    Zhou, Guangsheng
    SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2011, 57 (03) : 466 - 474
  • [40] Soil properties across a hydrological gradient in saladas from northeast Spain: what are the implications for soil carbon stocks, CO2 efflux and microbial communities in a warming world?
    Thomas, A. D.
    Tooth, S.
    Lan, S.
    Holt, T.
    Saunders, I
    Tarren, H.
    WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (04) : 715 - 735