Knowledge management in Russian higher education: faculty perspective

被引:0
作者
Markova, Tatiana [1 ]
机构
[1] Ural State Univ Econ, Dept Business Foreign Languages, 8 Marta Str 62, Ekaterinburg 620144, Russia
来源
IFKAD 2017: 12TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS: KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY: RESILIENCE, CREATIVITY AND CO-CREATION | 2017年
关键词
Knowledge Management; Higher Education; Transformation; Faculty Perspective; Performance Indicators;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to analyze the current state and crucial issues of knowledge assessment and measurement in Russian higher education (HE) from the faculty perspective. Knowledge management plays a vital role in HE institutions (HEI) as they are involved in creating and disseminating knowledge. Educators realize that creating a social environment in HEI that encourages faculty to continuously extend their own knowledge and develop effective ways of capturing new knowledge is the key to university prosperity. Design/methodology/approach - Based on extensive literature review, there are identified some issues related to knowledge management (KM) at HEI. The key issues involve: the measurement of teaching and research-based activities (publications, grant applications, scientific-research conferences) in faculty's professional work; the balance of quantitative and qualitative indicators used to assess faculty's performance; challenges of continuous professional development. Primary data were collected through surveys from a sample of HEI faculty and expert interviews. Based on empirical research, the study reveals major problems of managing faculty's knowledge at an individual level. Originality/value - The study makes a valuable contribution, given that there is a lack of empirical studies of this nature focusing on Russian HE institutions. Practical implications - The findings were reported to management of HE institutions and presented at some scientific-research conferences. Some ideas were realized in the system of key performance indicators introduced in 2016 with the aim to stimulate the faculty teaching and research creativity and enhance knowledge management effectiveness in Russian higher education.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 320
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM ED RES ASS 2003 A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, The Knowledge Creating
[3]  
Asmal K., 2000, S AFR J BUS MANAG, V31, P131
[4]  
Boyer EL., 1990, SCHOLARSHIP RECONSID
[5]  
Chou Y., 2005, Journal of College Teaching Learning, V2, P35, DOI DOI 10.19030/TLC.V2I9.1861
[6]  
Delanty G., 2001, CHALLENGING KNOWLEDG
[7]  
Fazlagic A., 2005, P C TRENDS MAN HUM R
[8]   The emerging knowledge governance approach: Challenges and characteristics [J].
Foss, Nicolai J. .
ORGANIZATION, 2007, 14 (01) :29-52
[9]  
Garrison D. R., 2004, Internet and Higher Education, V7, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
[10]  
Ivanov V.V., 2010, ISSUES MODERN EC, P334