A matter of time? Challenging and hindering effects of time pressure on work engagement

被引:69
作者
Baethge, Anja [1 ]
Vahle-Hinz, Tim [2 ]
Schulte-Braucks, Julia [3 ]
van Dick, Rolf [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Psychol, Work Org & Business Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, Occupat Hlth Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Business Educ & Management, Fac Law Management & Econ, Mainz, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Psychol, Social Psychol, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Oslo & Akershus Univ, Coll Appl Sci, Social Psychol & Org Behav, Work Res Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo & Akershus Univ, Coll Appl Sci, Social Psychol & Org Behav, Work Res Inst, Akershus, Norway
关键词
Time pressure; challenge and hindrance stressors; work engagement; diary study; time; OFF-JOB ACTIVITIES; STRESS; RESOURCES; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; DEMANDS; STRAIN; MODEL; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2017.1415998
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The aim of our research was to test time-exposure effects of time pressure as a stressor typically considered to be a challenge, rather than a hindrance stressor. We examined the within- and between-person effects of time pressure on work engagement in two diary/panel studies with employees using intervals of five days and three weeks, respectively (Study 1, n=350, and n=357, respectively) and six to eight weeks (Study 2, n=238). We assumed that it is a matter of time whether time pressure acts as a challenge (under short-term exposure) or as a hindrance stressor (under long-term exposure). We found significant positive within-person effects of time pressure on work engagement when controlling for strain in the daily and weekly diary assessment (Study 1), but a significant negative within-person effect in the six to eight weeks' assessment (Study 2). The between-person effects were significant and negative in all studies. Although a short-term increase can be beneficial for a certain time, stable and long-time exposure of time pressure does rather reduce work engagement. Thus, employers should not keep time pressure permanently high to motivate their employees. However, short-term increases of time pressure (e.g. before a deadline) may serve as a motivating factor.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 247
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   The Job Demands-Resources model: Challenges for future research [J].
Demerouti, Evangelia ;
Bakker, Arnold B. .
SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 37 (02)
[12]  
Dunckel H., 1999, HDB PSYCHOL ARBEITSA
[13]   How do occupational stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags in longitudinal studies [J].
Ford, Michael T. ;
Matthews, Russell A. ;
Wooldridge, Jessica D. ;
Mishra, Vipanchi ;
Kakar, Urszula M. ;
Strahan, Sarah R. .
WORK AND STRESS, 2014, 28 (01) :9-30
[14]  
Fried Y, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P404, DOI 10.2307/20159051
[15]  
GARDNER DG, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P81
[16]   Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being [J].
Haeusser, Jan Alexander ;
Mojzisch, Andreas ;
Niesel, Miriam ;
Schulz-Hardt, Stefan .
WORK AND STRESS, 2010, 24 (01) :1-35
[17]  
Hockey GRJ, 1997, BIOL PSYCHOL, V45, P73
[18]   Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? [J].
Ilies, Remus ;
Aw, Sherry S. Y. ;
Pluut, Helen .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 24 (06) :827-838
[19]  
Lepine JA, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P764, DOI 10.2307/20159696
[20]   Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance [J].
LePine, JA ;
LePine, MA ;
Jackson, CL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (05) :883-891