A matter of time? Challenging and hindering effects of time pressure on work engagement

被引:68
作者
Baethge, Anja [1 ]
Vahle-Hinz, Tim [2 ]
Schulte-Braucks, Julia [3 ]
van Dick, Rolf [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Psychol, Work Org & Business Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, Occupat Hlth Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Business Educ & Management, Fac Law Management & Econ, Mainz, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Psychol, Social Psychol, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Oslo & Akershus Univ, Coll Appl Sci, Social Psychol & Org Behav, Work Res Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo & Akershus Univ, Coll Appl Sci, Social Psychol & Org Behav, Work Res Inst, Akershus, Norway
关键词
Time pressure; challenge and hindrance stressors; work engagement; diary study; time; OFF-JOB ACTIVITIES; STRESS; RESOURCES; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; DEMANDS; STRAIN; MODEL; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2017.1415998
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The aim of our research was to test time-exposure effects of time pressure as a stressor typically considered to be a challenge, rather than a hindrance stressor. We examined the within- and between-person effects of time pressure on work engagement in two diary/panel studies with employees using intervals of five days and three weeks, respectively (Study 1, n=350, and n=357, respectively) and six to eight weeks (Study 2, n=238). We assumed that it is a matter of time whether time pressure acts as a challenge (under short-term exposure) or as a hindrance stressor (under long-term exposure). We found significant positive within-person effects of time pressure on work engagement when controlling for strain in the daily and weekly diary assessment (Study 1), but a significant negative within-person effect in the six to eight weeks' assessment (Study 2). The between-person effects were significant and negative in all studies. Although a short-term increase can be beneficial for a certain time, stable and long-time exposure of time pressure does rather reduce work engagement. Thus, employers should not keep time pressure permanently high to motivate their employees. However, short-term increases of time pressure (e.g. before a deadline) may serve as a motivating factor.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 247
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [11] The Job Demands-Resources model: Challenges for future research
    Demerouti, Evangelia
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    [J]. SA JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 37 (02)
  • [12] Dunckel H., 1999, HDB PSYCHOL ARBEITSA
  • [13] How do occupational stressor-strain effects vary with time? A review and meta-analysis of the relevance of time lags in longitudinal studies
    Ford, Michael T.
    Matthews, Russell A.
    Wooldridge, Jessica D.
    Mishra, Vipanchi
    Kakar, Urszula M.
    Strahan, Sarah R.
    [J]. WORK AND STRESS, 2014, 28 (01) : 9 - 30
  • [14] Fried Y, 2004, ACAD MANAGE REV, V29, P404, DOI 10.2307/20159051
  • [15] GARDNER DG, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P81
  • [16] Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being
    Haeusser, Jan Alexander
    Mojzisch, Andreas
    Niesel, Miriam
    Schulz-Hardt, Stefan
    [J]. WORK AND STRESS, 2010, 24 (01) : 1 - 35
  • [17] Hockey GRJ, 1997, BIOL PSYCHOL, V45, P73
  • [18] Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here?
    Ilies, Remus
    Aw, Sherry S. Y.
    Pluut, Helen
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 24 (06) : 827 - 838
  • [19] Lepine JA, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P764, DOI 10.2307/20159696
  • [20] Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance
    LePine, JA
    LePine, MA
    Jackson, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (05) : 883 - 891