A matter of time? Challenging and hindering effects of time pressure on work engagement

被引:68
作者
Baethge, Anja [1 ]
Vahle-Hinz, Tim [2 ]
Schulte-Braucks, Julia [3 ]
van Dick, Rolf [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Psychol, Work Org & Business Psychol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, Occupat Hlth Psychol, Berlin, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Business Educ & Management, Fac Law Management & Econ, Mainz, Germany
[4] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Psychol, Social Psychol, Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Oslo & Akershus Univ, Coll Appl Sci, Social Psychol & Org Behav, Work Res Inst, Oslo, Norway
[6] Oslo & Akershus Univ, Coll Appl Sci, Social Psychol & Org Behav, Work Res Inst, Akershus, Norway
关键词
Time pressure; challenge and hindrance stressors; work engagement; diary study; time; OFF-JOB ACTIVITIES; STRESS; RESOURCES; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; DEMANDS; STRAIN; MODEL; SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/02678373.2017.1415998
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The aim of our research was to test time-exposure effects of time pressure as a stressor typically considered to be a challenge, rather than a hindrance stressor. We examined the within- and between-person effects of time pressure on work engagement in two diary/panel studies with employees using intervals of five days and three weeks, respectively (Study 1, n=350, and n=357, respectively) and six to eight weeks (Study 2, n=238). We assumed that it is a matter of time whether time pressure acts as a challenge (under short-term exposure) or as a hindrance stressor (under long-term exposure). We found significant positive within-person effects of time pressure on work engagement when controlling for strain in the daily and weekly diary assessment (Study 1), but a significant negative within-person effect in the six to eight weeks' assessment (Study 2). The between-person effects were significant and negative in all studies. Although a short-term increase can be beneficial for a certain time, stable and long-time exposure of time pressure does rather reduce work engagement. Thus, employers should not keep time pressure permanently high to motivate their employees. However, short-term increases of time pressure (e.g. before a deadline) may serve as a motivating factor.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 247
页数:20
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SALUTOGENETISCHE SUB
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
  • [3] Just more of the same, or different? An integrative theoretical framework for the study of cumulative interruptions at work
    Baethge, Anja
    Rigotti, Thomas
    Roe, Robert A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 24 (02) : 308 - 323
  • [4] Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
    Leiter, Michael P.
    Taris, Toon W.
    [J]. WORK AND STRESS, 2008, 22 (03) : 187 - 200
  • [5] Bliese Paul., 2013, Multilevel modeling in R (2.5)
  • [6] Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain
    Boswell, WR
    Olson-Buchanan, JB
    LePine, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 64 (01) : 165 - 181
  • [7] An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers
    Cavanaugh, MA
    Boswell, WR
    Roehling, MV
    Boudreau, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (01) : 65 - 74
  • [8] A Double-Edged Sword: The Effects of Challenge and Hindrance Time Pressure on New Product Development Teams
    Chong, Darrel S. F.
    Van Eerde, Wendelien
    Chai, Kah Hin
    Rutte, Christel G.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2011, 58 (01) : 71 - 86
  • [9] Linking Job Demands and Resources to Employee Engagement and Burnout: A Theoretical Extension and Meta-Analytic Test
    Crawford, Eean R.
    LePine, Jeffery A.
    Rich, Bruce Louis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (05) : 834 - 848
  • [10] The job demands-resources model of burnout
    Demerouti, E
    Bakker, AB
    Nachreiner, F
    Schaufeli, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) : 499 - 512