A Systematic Review of Experimental Strategies Aimed at Improving Motor Function after Acute and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury

被引:68
作者
Gomes-Osman, Joyce [1 ]
Cortes, Mar [2 ]
Guest, James [3 ]
Pascual-Leone, Alvaro [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Berenson Allen Ctr Noninvas Brain Stimulat, Dept Neurol,Med Sch, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Burke Med Res Inst, Noninvas Brain Stimulat & Human Motor Control Lab, White Plains, NY USA
[3] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Miami Project Cure Paralysis, Dept Neurol Surg,Lois Pope LIFE Ctr, Miami, FL 33136 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
rehabilitation; electrophysiology; cell transplantation; human studies; spinal cord injury; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CELL TRANSPLANTATION; MASSED PRACTICE; CLINICAL-TRIAL; WALKING ABILITY; ICCP PANEL; PHASE-I; INDIVIDUALS; RECOVERY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1089/neu.2014.3812
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
While various approaches have been proposed in clinical trials aimed at improving motor function after spinal cord injury in humans, there is still limited information regarding the scope, methodological quality, and evidence associated with single-intervention and multi-intervention approaches. A systematic review performed using the PubMed search engine and the key words "spinal cord injury motor recovery" identified 1973 records, of which 39 were selected (18 from the search records and 21 from reference list inspection). Study phase (clinicaltrials.org criteria) and methodological quality (Cochrane criteria) were assessed. Studies included proposed a broad range of single-intervention (encompassing cell therapies, pharmacology, electrical stimulation, rehabilitation) (encompassing cell therapies, pharmacology, electrical stimulation, rehabilitation) and multi-intervention approaches (that combined more than one strategy). The highest evidence level was for Phase III studies supporting the role of multi-intervention approaches that contained a rehabilitation component. Quality appraisal revealed that the percentage of selected studies classified with high risk of bias by Cochrane criteria was as follows: random sequence generation = 64%; allocation concealment = 77%; blinding of participants and personnel = 69%; blinding of outcome assessment = 64%; attrition = 44%; selective reporting = 44%. The current literature contains a high proportion of studies with a limited ability to measure efficacy in a valid manner because of low methodological strength in all items of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment. Recommendations to decrease bias are discussed and include increased methodological rigor in the study design and recruitment of study participants, and the use of electrophysiological and imaging measures that can assess functional integrity of the spinal cord (and may be sufficiently sensitive to detect changes that occur in response to therapeutic interventions).
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 438
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Lokomat Robotic-Assisted Versus Overground Training Within 3 to 6 Months of Incomplete Spinal Cord Lesion: Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Alcobendas-Maestro, Monica ;
Esclarin-Ruz, Ana ;
Casado-Lopez, Rosa M. ;
Munoz-Gonzalez, Alejandro ;
Perez-Mateos, Guillermo ;
Gonzalez-Valdizan, Esteban ;
Martin, Jose Luis R. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2012, 26 (09) :1058-1063
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SPIN CORD INJ FACTS, pBirmingham
[3]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSMENT DIFFERENT
[4]   Sensory stimulation augments training in persons with the effects of massed practice tetraplegia [J].
Beekhuizen, Kristina S. ;
Field-Fote, Edelle C. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (04) :602-608
[5]   Massed practice versus massed practice with a stimulation: Effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury [J].
Beekhuizen, KS ;
Field-Fote, EC .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2005, 19 (01) :33-45
[6]   Relationship Between ASIA Examination and Functional Outcomes in the NeuroRecovery Network Locomotor Training Program [J].
Buehner, Jeffrey J. ;
Forrest, Gail F. ;
Schmidt-Read, Mary ;
White, Susan ;
Tansey, Keith ;
Basso, Michele .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (09) :1530-1540
[7]   Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury Enhanced by Strengthening Corticospinal Synaptic Transmission [J].
Bunday, Karen L. ;
Perez, Monica A. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (24) :2355-2361
[8]   Novel combination strategies to repair the injured mammalian spinal cord [J].
Bunge, Mary Bartlett .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2008, 31 (03) :262-269
[9]  
Bunge R P, 1997, Adv Neurol, V72, P305
[10]   Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury [J].
Casha, Steven ;
Zygun, David ;
McGowan, M. Dan ;
Bains, Ish ;
Yong, V. Wee ;
Hurlbert, R. John .
BRAIN, 2012, 135 :1224-1236