Economic Evaluations of Pharmacologic Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review

被引:26
作者
Onuoha, Erica N. [1 ]
Leff, Jared A. [1 ]
Schackman, Bruce R. [1 ]
McCollister, Kathryn E. [2 ]
Polsky, Daniel [3 ,4 ]
Murphy, Sean M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Healthcare Policy & Res, New York, NY USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Johns Hopkins Carey Business Sch, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
cost-benefit analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost offset; healthcare utilization; opioid use disorder; systematic review; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; UNITED-STATES; BUPRENORPHINE; METHADONE; NALTREXONE; DEPENDENCE; ADDICTION; DETOXIFICATION; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The crisis of opioid use puts a strain on resources in the United States and worldwide. There are 3 US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for treatment of opioid use disorder: methadone, buprenorphine, and injectable extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX). The comparative effectiveness and cost vary considerably among these 3 medications. Economic evaluations provide evidence that help stakeholders efficiently allocate scarce resources. Our objective was to summarize recent health economic evidence of pharmacologic treatment of opioid use disorder interventions. Methods: We searched PubMed for peer-reviewed studies in English from August 2015 through December 2019 as an update to a 2015 review. We used the Drummond checklist to evaluate and categorize economic evaluation study quality. We summarized results by economic evaluation methodology and pharmacologic treatment modality. Results: We identified 105 articles as potentially relevant and included 21 (4 cost-offset studies and 17 cost-effectiveness/costbenefit studies). We found strengthened evidence on buprenorphine and methadone, indicating that these treatments are economically advantageous compared with no pharmacotherapy, but found limited evidence on XR-NTX. Only half of the cost-effectiveness studies used a generic preference-based measure of effectiveness, limiting broad comparison across diseases/disorders. The disease/disorder-specific cost-effectiveness measures vary widely, suggesting a lack of consensus on the value of substance use disorder treatment. Conclusion: We found studies that provide new evidence supporting the cost-effectiveness of buprenorphine compared with no pharmacotherapy. We found a lack of evidence supporting superior economic value for buprenorphine versus methadone, suggesting that both are attractive alternatives. Further economic research is needed on XR-NTX, as well as other emerging pharmacotherapies, treatment modalities, and dosage forms.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1083
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[21]   Implementation of methadone therapy for opioid use disorder in Russia - a modeled cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Idrisov, Bulat ;
Murphy, Sean M. ;
Morrill, Tyler ;
Saadoun, Mayada ;
Lunze, Karsten ;
Shepard, Donald .
SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2017, 12
[22]   American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) National Practice Guideline for the Use of Medications in the Treatment of Addiction Involving Opioid Use [J].
Kampman, Kyle ;
Jarvis, Margaret .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2015, 9 (05) :358-367
[23]   Use of opioid substitution therapies in the treatment of opioid use disorder: results of a UK cost-effectiveness modelling study [J].
Kenworthy, James ;
Yi, Yunni ;
Wright, Antony ;
Brown, Jim ;
Madrigal, Ana Maria ;
Dunlop, William C. N. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (07) :740-748
[24]   Office-Based Buprenorphine Versus Clinic-Based Methadone: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis [J].
King, Jordan B. ;
Sainski-Nguyen, Amy M. ;
Bellows, Brandon K. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN & PALLIATIVE CARE PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 30 (01) :55-65
[25]   Cost-Effectiveness of Publicly Funded Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder in California [J].
Krebs, Emanuel ;
Enns, Benjamin ;
Evans, Elizabeth ;
Urada, Darren ;
Anglin, M. Douglas ;
Rawson, Richard A. ;
Hser, Yih-Ing ;
Nosyk, Bohdan .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 168 (01) :10-+
[26]   The costs of crime during and after publicly funded treatment for opioid use disorders: a population-level study for the state of California [J].
Krebs, Emanuel ;
Urada, Darren ;
Evans, Elizabeth ;
Huang, David ;
Hser, Yih-Ing ;
Nosyk, Bohdan .
ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (05) :838-851
[27]   Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an adjunctive personalised psychosocial intervention in treatment-resistant maintenance opioid agonist therapy: a pragmatic, open-label, randomised controlled trial [J].
Marsden, John ;
Stillwell, Garry ;
James, Kirsty ;
Shearer, James ;
Byford, Sarah ;
Hellier, Jennifer ;
Kelleher, Michael ;
Kelly, Joanna ;
Murphy, Caroline ;
Mitcheson, Luke .
LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 6 (05) :391-402
[28]   Strengthening partnerships between substance use researchers and policy makers to take advantage of a window of opportunity [J].
Meisel, Zachary F. ;
Mitchell, Julia ;
Polsky, Daniel ;
Boualam, Nada ;
McGeoch, Ellen ;
Weiner, Janet ;
Miclette, Matthew ;
Purtle, Jonathan ;
Schackman, Bruce ;
Cannuscio, Carolyn C. .
SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2019, 14 (1)
[29]   Impact of Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Addiction on Medicaid Expenditures and Health Services Utilization Rates in Vermont [J].
Mohlman, Mary Kate ;
Tanzman, Beth ;
Finison, Karl ;
Pinette, Melanie ;
Jones, Craig .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2016, 67 :9-14
[30]   Injectable naltrexone, oral naltrexone, and buprenorphine utilization and discontinuation among individuals treated for opioid use disorder in a United States commercially insured population [J].
Morgan, Jake R. ;
Schackman, Bruce R. ;
Leff, Jared A. ;
Linas, Benjamin P. ;
Walley, Alexander Y. .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2018, 85 :90-96