THE VALIDITY OF SESSION-RATING OF PERCEIVED EXERTION METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING TRAINING LOAD IN TEAMGYM

被引:35
作者
Minganti, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Capranica, Laura [2 ]
Meeusen, Romain [3 ]
Amici, Stefano [2 ]
Piacentini, Maria Francesca [2 ]
机构
[1] Magna Graecia Univ Catanzaro, Sch Med, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Catanzaro, Italy
[2] Univ Foro Italico, Dept Human Movement & Sport Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] Free Univ Brussels, Dept Human Physiol & Sports Med, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
rating of perceived exertion; heart rate; visual analogue scale; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; PERFORMANCE; VAS;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc26b9
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Teamgym is a new and emerging closed-skill sport, which includes tumbling, trampette, and floor programs performed by teams ranging from 6 to 12 athletes. The purpose of this study was to verify the concurrent validity of the session-rating of perceived exertion ([RPE] session-RPE) to quantifying the internal training load (ITL) of tumbling, trampette, and floor training sessions using Edwards' summated heart rate (HR)-zone method as a criterion measure. Session-RPE was obtained with 2 different instruments (i.e., CR-10 Borg's scale and visual analog scale) multiplied by the training duration (minutes). Ten female teamgym athletes (age = 21.7 +/- 1.2 years; height = 164.9 +/- 6.6 cm; and body mass = 54.6 +/- 5.4 kg) participated in this study. High and significant correlations (r range: 0.77-0.85; R-2 range: 0.59-0.85; p, 0.01) were found between Edwards' HR and the session-RPE methods and between the 2 session-PE instruments (r range: 0.92-0.97; R-2 range: 0.85-0.94; p < .01). The significant (p < 0.05) differences emerged between training sessions indicate that session-RPE discriminates ITL in relation to various technical skills. Hence, session-RPE can be a useful and inexpensive tool to quantify ITL in teamgym, and coaches could use this instrument to monitor their periodization plan as experienced by the athletes.
引用
收藏
页码:3063 / 3068
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Banister E.W., 1975, AUSTR J SPORTS MED, V7, P57
[2]  
Bompa T.O., 2009, PERIODIZATION THEORY, V5th
[3]  
Borg G., 1998, BORGS PERCEIVED EXER, DOI DOI 10.1249/00005768-199809000-00018
[4]   Quantifying Training Load: A Comparison of Subjective and Objective Methods [J].
Borresen, Jill ;
Lambert, Michael I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2008, 3 (01) :16-30
[5]   The Quantification of Training Load, the Training Response and the Effect on Performance [J].
Borresen, Jill ;
Lambert, Michael Ian .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 39 (09) :779-795
[6]  
Brown DD, 2000, EXERCISE SPORT SCI, P117
[7]   Modeling of adaptations to physical training by using a recursive least squares algorithm [J].
Busso, T ;
Denis, C ;
Bonnefoy, R ;
Geyssant, A ;
Lacour, JR .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 82 (05) :1685-1693
[8]   Comparison between the CR10 Borg's scale and the VAS (visual analogue scale) during an arm-cranking exercise [J].
Capodaglio, EM .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 11 (02) :69-74
[9]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[10]  
Edwards A.L., 1984, INTRO LINEAR REGRESS