PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF MAIZE AND WEEDS IN COEXISTENCE

被引:0
|
作者
Barros, R. E. [1 ]
Faria, R. M. [1 ]
Tuffi Santos, L. D. [1 ]
Azevedo, A. M. [1 ]
Governici, J. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Montes Claros, MG, Brazil
关键词
Zea mays; Urochloa brizantha; Sorghum arundinaceum; photosynthetic rate; transpiration; competition; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; STOMATAL CLOSURE; CANOPY STRUCTURE; GROWTH; INTERFERENCE; PERFORMANCE; HYDRAULICS; YIELD; CORN;
D O I
10.1590/S0100-83582017350100027
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
This study aimed at evaluating the physiology of maize and weeds when living under different densities. The randomized block design with 4 replications was used. The factorial scheme 5 x 2 + 1 and 5 x 3 was adopted, for maize and weeds respectively, corresponding to weed species (Bidens pilosa, Commelina benghalensis, Urochloa brizantha, Sorghum arundinaceum and Ipomoea triloba) and infestation density (control, 15 and 30 plants m(-2)). Weeds were kept in coexistence with the maize hybrid DKB 390 PRO 2, with an additional treatment for maize plants absent of competition. It was kept in coexistence with maize hybrid DKB 390 PRO 2 besides an additional treatment with maize plants absent of competition. On day 45 and 60 after maize planting (DAP) physiological reviews were performed within the culture, and 38 days after weed transplanting (DAT), an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) was used. There were physiological changes in maize due to the coexistence with weeds. On day 45 DAP, the competition, regardless of the weed species, caused less photosynthetic rate in maize coexisting with 15 plants m(-2); the stomatal conductance was lower in both densities. On day 60 DAP, maize in competition with 15 and 30 plants m(-2) showed lower transpiration rate. U. brizantha and S. arundinaceum showed reduction in photosynthesis and transpiration, due to increased density and coexistence with maize.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thiamethoxam as a seed treatment alters the physiological response of maize (Zea mays) seedlings to neighbouring weeds
    Afifi, Maha
    Lee, Elizabeth
    Lukens, Lewis
    Swanton, Clarence
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 71 (04) : 505 - 514
  • [2] WEEDS IN MAIZE
    ATKINSON, GC
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE, 1978, 136 (09): : 39 - &
  • [3] Physiological response of maize to arsenic contamination
    Stoeva, N
    Berova, M
    Zlatev, Z
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2003, 47 (03) : 449 - 452
  • [4] Maize seed and stem roots differ in response to neighbouring weeds
    Afifi, M.
    Swanton, C.
    WEED RESEARCH, 2011, 51 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [5] Late emergence of weeds in maize
    Reisinger, P.
    Lehoczky, E.
    Komives, T.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT DISEASES AND PROTECTION, 2006, : 401 - 405
  • [6] Critical period of weeds in maize
    Tereshchuk, V
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ESTONIAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VOL 209, 2000, 209 : 204 - 206
  • [7] MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE OF MAIZE SEEDLINGS TO CHILLING STRESS
    Nikolic, Ana
    Kravic, Natalija
    Ristic, Danijela
    Andjelkovic, Violeta
    Markovic, Ksenija
    Vancetovic, Jelena
    Ignjatovic-Micic, Dragana
    GENETIKA-BELGRADE, 2020, 52 (02): : 689 - 698
  • [8] Weeds as crops: The value of maize field weeds in the valley of Toluca, Mexico
    Vieyra-Odilon, L
    Vibrans, H
    ECONOMIC BOTANY, 2001, 55 (03) : 426 - 443
  • [9] INFLUENCE OF SOIL TILLAGE ON WEEDS IN MAIZE
    Chovancova, S.
    Rohacek, P.
    Illek, F.
    Prochazkova, B.
    Winkler, J.
    MENDELNET 2013, 2013, : 48 - 52
  • [10] COMPETITION BETWEEN WEEDS AND MAIZE PLANTS
    Dogaru, V.
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES A-AGRONOMY, 2010, 53 : 312 - 315