Process indicators from ten centres in the Finnish breast cancer screening programme from 1991 to 2000

被引:39
作者
Sarkeala, T
Anttila, A
Forsman, H
Luostarinen, T
Saarenmaa, I
Hakama, M
机构
[1] Finnish Canc Registry, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Pirkanmaa Canc Soc, Tampere 33100, Finland
[3] Univ Tampere, Dept Publ Hlth, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
关键词
epidemiology; screening; mammography; breast cancer; quality assurance; effectiveness;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2004.06.017
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the Finnish mammography programme by assessing process indicators from 10 screening centres using data from the first and subsequent screens. We compared these screen-specific indicators with European standards and results from countries with similar screening protocols. Ten Finnish centres invited approximately 1000000 women from 1991-2000. Women were mainly 50-64 years old. Mean compliance amongst this age group was 90% at the first and 93% at subsequent screens. The corresponding recall rates were 4.6% and 2.3%, respectively. The average breast cancer detection rates were 0.44% and 0.36%, respectively. The positive predictive values (PPVs) of mammography at the first and subsequent screens were 10% (range 7-20%) and 16% (range 12-31%), and the corresponding benign to malignant (B:M) biopsy ratios were 1:1 (range 0.5-1.8:1) and 0.4:1 (range 0.3-0.8:1). The PPV of mammography increased significantly during the study period, and the average process indicators fulfilled the criteria of the European community for the most part. However, the variation in PPVs was wide, as has been seen for other European mammography programmes, indicating meaningful differences in diagnostic criteria and potential adverse effects. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2116 / 2125
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, BREAST CANC SCREEN
  • [2] Programme sensitivity and effectiveness of mammography service screening in Helsinki, Finland
    Anttila, A
    Koskela, J
    Hakama, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (04) : 153 - 158
  • [3] Does individual programme size affect screening performance? Results from the United Kingdom NHS breast screening programme
    Blanks, RG
    Bennett, RL
    Wallis, MG
    Moss, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [4] Monitoring and evaluating the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: evaluating the variation in radiological performance between individual programmes using PPV-referral diagrams
    Blanks, RG
    Moss, SM
    Wallis, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2001, 8 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [5] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMS - THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
    DAY, NE
    WILLIAMS, DRR
    KHAW, KT
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (06) : 954 - 958
  • [6] DEAN B, 1999, ACTA ONCOL S, V13, P47
  • [7] *EUR COMM, 2001, EUR GUID QUAL ASS MA
  • [8] Fracheboud J, 1998, INT J CANCER, V75, P694, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980302)75:5<694::AID-IJC6>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-U
  • [10] Interval cancers in the Dutch breast cancer screening programme
    Fracheboud, J
    de Koning, HJ
    Beemsterboer, PMM
    Boer, R
    Verbeek, ALM
    Hendriks, JHCL
    van Ineveld, BM
    Broeders, MJM
    de Bruyn, AE
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 81 (05) : 912 - 917