Is Peace in the Interests of Justice? The Case for Broad Prosecutorial Discretion at the International Criminal Court

被引:13
作者
Rodman, Kenneth A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colby Coll, Waterville, ME 04901 USA
关键词
conflict resolution; human rights; International Criminal Court; international criminal law; prosecutorial discretion; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1017/S0922156508005657
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The argument against factoring peace processes into the discretion of the ICC Prosecutor is based on the premise that international law can be decontextualized from international politics and that in doing so will have superior consequences in terms of deterring atrocity and in consolidating peace. This view is at odds with the history of international criminal tribunals and the cases currently under review by the ICC. Those episodes demonstrate that the effectiveness of international criminal justice and its impact on peace are shaped and constrained by the political strategies of conflict resolution Used by states and intergovernmental organizations to end criminal violence. Hence the Prosecutor should construe his discretion broadly to take account of the political context in which international criminal law has to operate.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 126
页数:28
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
ALLEN T, 2006, TRIAL JUSTICE INT CR, P93
[2]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES 0418
[3]  
[Anonymous], COUNTR REP HUM RIGHT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, INF M LEG ADV MIN FO, P7
[5]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES
[6]  
BAINES EK, 2007, INT J TRANSIT JUST, V1, P103
[7]  
BASS GARY JONATHAN, 2000, STAY HAND VENGEANCE, P20
[8]   Jus post bellum [J].
Bass, GJ .
PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2004, 32 (04) :384-412
[9]  
BASSIOUNI MC, 2004, CASE W RESERVE LAW J, V35, P191
[10]  
Bassiouni MC, 1997, HARVARD HUMAN RIGHTS, V10, P12