Segmental foot and ankle kinematic differences between rectus, planus, and cavus foot types

被引:23
作者
Kruger, Karen M. [1 ,2 ]
Graf, Adam [2 ]
Flanagan, Ann [2 ]
McHenry, Benjamin D. [1 ]
Altiok, Haluk [2 ]
Smith, Peter A. [2 ]
Harris, Gerald F. [1 ,2 ]
Krzakbc, Joseph J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Marquette Univ, POB 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Shriners Hosp Children, 2211 N Oak Pk Ave, Chicago, IL 60707 USA
[3] Midwestern Univ, Phys Therapy Program, 555 31st St, Downers Grove, IL 60515 USA
关键词
Foot and ankle; Gait; Foot type; Kinematics; Windlass mechanism; MODEL; GAIT; FEET; CHILDREN; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.032
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The presence of multiple foot types has been used to explain the variability of foot structure observed among healthy adults. These foot types were determined by specific static morphologic features and included rectus (well aligned hindfoot/forefoot), planus (low arched), and cavus (high arched) foot types. Unique biomechanical characteristics of these foot types have been identified but reported differences in segmental foot kinematics among them has been inconsistent due to differences in neutral referencing and evaluation of only select discrete variables. This study used the radiographically-indexed Milwaukee Foot Model to evaluate differences in segmental foot kinematics among healthy adults with rectus, planus, and cavus feet based on the true bony alignment between segments. Based on the definitions of the individual foot types and due to conflicting results in previous literature, the primary study outcome was peak coronal hindfoot position during stance phase. Additionally, locally weighted regression smoothing with alpha-adjusted serial t-test analysis (LAAST) was used to compare these foot types across the entire gait cycle. Average peak hindfoot inversion was -1.6 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees, 6.7 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees, and 13.6 degrees +/- 4.6 degrees, for the Planus, Rectus, and Cavus Groups, respectively. There were significant differences among all comparisons. Differences were observed between the Rectus and Planus Groups and Cavus and Planus Groups throughout the gait cycle. Additionally, the Planus Group had a premature peak velocity toward coronal varus and early transition toward valgus, likely due to a deficient windlass mechanism. This assessment of kinematic data across the gait cycle can help understand differences in dynamic foot function among foot types. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 186
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Recommendations for the reporting of foot and ankle models
    Bishop, Chris
    Paul, Gunther
    Thewlis, Dominic
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 45 (13) : 2185 - 2194
  • [2] Brockett Claire L, 2016, Orthop Trauma, V30, P232
  • [3] Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Levinger, Pazit
    Murley, George S.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Nester, Christopher J.
    Landorf, Karl B.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 42 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [4] The effect of pes caves on foot pain and plantar pressure
    Burns, J
    Crosbie, J
    Hunt, A
    Ouvrier, R
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 20 (09) : 877 - 882
  • [5] Effects of plantar fascia stiffness on the biomechanical responses of the ankle-foot complex
    Cheung, JTM
    Zhang, M
    An, KN
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 19 (08) : 839 - 846
  • [6] Cosmatos D, 2009, CH CRC BIOSTAT SER, P1
  • [7] Biplane fluoroscopy for hindfoot motion analysis during gait: A model-based evaluation
    Cross, Janelle A.
    McHenry, Benjamin D.
    Molthen, Robert
    Exten, Emily
    Schmidt, Taly Gilat
    Harris, Gerald F.
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2017, 43 : 118 - 123
  • [8] Quantitative segmental analysis of weight-bearing radiographs of the foot and ankle for children - Normal alignment
    Davids, JR
    Gibson, TW
    Pugh, LI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 25 (06) : 769 - 776
  • [9] De Doncker E, 1970, Acta Orthop Belg, V36, P386
  • [10] Concurrent validity of an automated algorithm for computing the center of pressure excursion index (CPEI)
    Diaz, Michelle A.
    Gibbons, Mandi W.
    Song, Jinsup
    Hillstrom, Howard J.
    Choe, Kersti H.
    Pasquale, Maria R.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2018, 59 : 7 - 10