Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors

被引:166
作者
Lovering, Jessica R. [1 ]
Yip, Arthur [1 ,2 ]
Nordhaus, Ted [1 ]
机构
[1] Breakthrough Inst, 436 14th St STE 820, Oakland, CA 94612 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Nuclear construction costs; Experience curves; International comparison; LEARNING-CURVES; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; EXPERIENCE CURVES; FUTURE; ELECTRICITY; COAL; US; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The existing literature on the construction costs of nuclear power reactors has focused almost exclusively on trends in construction costs in only two countries, the United States and France, and during two decades, the 1970s and 1980s. These analyses, Koomey and Hultman (2007); Grubler (2010), and Escobar-Rangel and Leveque (2015), study only 26% of reactors built globally between 1960 and 2010, providing an incomplete picture of the economic evolution of nuclear power construction. This study curates historical reactor-specific overnight construction cost (OCC) data that broaden the scope of study substantially, covering the full cost history for 349 reactors in the US, France, Canada, West Germany, Japan, India, and South Korea, encompassing 58% of all reactors built globally. We find that trends in costs have varied significantly in magnitude and in structure by era, country, and experience. In contrast to the rapid cost escalation that characterized nuclear construction in the United States, we find evidence of much milder cost escalation in many countries, including absolute cost declines in some countries and specific eras. Our new findings suggest that there is no inherent cost escalation trend associated with nuclear technology. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 382
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CONTR WORK GROUP 3 5
[2]  
Azevedo I., 2013, MODELLING TECHNOLOGY, P59
[3]   The differential impact of low-carbon technologies on climate change mitigation cost under a range of socioeconomic and climate policy scenarios [J].
Barron, Robert ;
McJeon, Haewon .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 80 :264-274
[4]  
Bate D. L., 1982, P IAEA INT C NUCL PO
[5]  
Berthelemy M., 2012, CERNA WORKING PAPER, V2012-01
[6]   Nuclear reactors' construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress [J].
Berthelemy, Michel ;
Rangel, Lina Escobar .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 82 :118-130
[7]   The cost of nuclear electricity: France after Fukushima [J].
Boccard, Nicolas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 :450-461
[8]   Construction management of Indian pressurized heavy water reactors [J].
Bohra, SA ;
Sharma, PD .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2006, 236 (7-8) :836-851
[9]   Understanding wind turbine price trends in the U.S. over the past decade [J].
Bolinger, Mark ;
Wiser, Ryan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 42 :628-641
[10]   Sensitivity to energy technology costs: A multi-model comparison analysis [J].
Bosetti, Valentina ;
Marangoni, Giacomo ;
Borgonovo, Emanuele ;
Anadon, Laura Diaz ;
Barron, Robert ;
McJeon, Haewon C. ;
Politis, Savvas ;
Friley, Paul .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 80 :244-263