Recent Trends in Patient Registries for Health Services Research

被引:5
作者
Stausberg, Juergen [1 ]
Harkener, Sonja [1 ]
Semler, Sebastian C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Fac Med, Inst Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol IMIBE, Essen, Nordrhein Westf, Germany
[2] TMF Technol, Methods & Infrastruct Networked Med Res, Berlin, Germany
关键词
health services research; patient-reported outcome measures; patients; registries; trends;
D O I
10.1055/s-0041-1724104
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Background Patient registries are an established methodology in health services research. Since more than 150 years, registries collect information concerning groups of similar patients to answer research questions. Elaborated recommendations about an appropriate development and an efficient operation of registries are available. However, the scene changes rapidly. Objectives The aim of the study is to describe current trends in registry research for health services research. Methods Registries developed within a German funding scheme for model registries in health services research were analyzed. The observations were compared with recent recommendations of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) on registries in the 21st century. Results Analyzing six registries from the funding scheme revealed the following trends: recruiting healthy individuals, representing familial or other interpersonal relationships, recording of patient-reported experiences or outcomes, accepting participants as study sites, active informing of participants, integrating the registry with other data collections, and transferring data from the registry to electronic patient records. This list partly complies with the issues discussed by the AHRQ. The AHRQ structured its ideas in five chapters, increasing focus on the patient, engaging patients as partners, digital health and patient registries, direct-to-patient registry, and registry networks. Conclusion For the near future, it can be said that the concept and the design of a registry should place the patient in the center. Registries will be increasingly linked together and interconnected with other data collections. New challenges arise regarding the management of data quality and the interpretation of results from less controlled settings. Here, further research related to the methodology of registries is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:E1 / E8
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Brooke E.M., 1974, CURRENT FUTURE USE R
[2]   Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients' responses and impact on data quality [J].
Chang, Eric M. ;
Gillespie, Erin F. ;
Shaverdian, Narek .
PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2019, 10 :171-186
[3]   Capturing Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Data Electronically: The Past, Present, and Promise of ePRO Measurement in Clinical Trials [J].
Coons, Stephen Joel ;
Eremenco, Sonya ;
Lundy, J. Jason ;
O'Donohoe, Paul ;
O'Gorman, Hannah ;
Malizia, William .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (04) :301-309
[4]   Registries for Robust Evidence [J].
Dreyer, Nancy A. ;
Garner, Sarah .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 302 (07) :790-791
[5]   Exploring Concordance of Patient-Reported Information on PatientsLikeMe and Medical Claims Data at the Patient Level [J].
Eichler, Gabriel S. ;
Cochin, Elisenda ;
Han, Jian ;
Hu, Sylvia ;
Vaughan, Timothy E. ;
Wicks, Paul ;
Barr, Charles ;
Devenport, Jenny .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (05)
[6]   A survey of Australian clinical registries: can quality of care be measured? [J].
Evans, S. M. ;
Bohensky, M. ;
Cameron, P. A. ;
McNeil, J. .
INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 41 (1A) :42-48
[7]   Linking hospital patient records for suspected or established acute coronary syndrome in a complex secondary care system: a proof-of-concept e-registry in National Health Service Scotland [J].
Findlay, Iain ;
Morris, Tamsin ;
Zhang, Ruiqi ;
McCowan, Colin ;
Shield, Sarah ;
Forbes, Brian ;
McConnachie, Alex ;
Mangion, Kenneth ;
Berry, Colin .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-QUALITY OF CARE AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES, 2018, 4 (03) :155-167
[8]   The Future of Registries in the Era of Real-world Evidence for Medical Devices [J].
Fleurence, Rachael L. ;
Blake, Kathleen ;
Shuren, Jeffrey .
JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 4 (03) :197-198
[9]  
Gliklich R.E., 2018, 21st Century patient registries: Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: A users guide: 3rd Edition, Addendum
[10]   Towards a Core Set of Indicators for Data Quality of Registries [J].
Harkener, Sonja ;
Stausberg, Jurgen ;
Hagel, Christiane ;
Siddiqui, Roman .
GERMAN MEDICAL DATA SCIENCES: SHAPING CHANGE - CREATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR INNOVATIVE MEDICINE (GMDS 2019), 2019, 267 :39-45