Counterproductive behaviour at work: an investigation into reduction strategies

被引:40
作者
Chang, Kirk [1 ]
Smithikrai, Chuchai [2 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Business, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Humanities, Dept Psychol, Chiang Mai 50000, Thailand
关键词
counterproductive work behaviour; organizational citizenship behaviour; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; WORKPLACE; METAANALYSIS; DIMENSIONS; INEQUITY; DEVIANCE; JUSTICE; ROLES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/09585192.2010.483852
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The present study examined the interrelation of personality characteristics, organizational justice, organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), and counterproductive work behaviour (CWB). An anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted, with 1662 participants representing a wide variety of jobs across heterogeneous organizations in Thailand. Statistical analysis indicated that CWB can be predicted by the following personality characteristics; conscientiousness, agreeableness, self-esteem, extraversion, neuroticism and openness to experience. Moderation analysis discovered that the association between personality characteristics and CWB is moderated by three factors; distributive justice, interactional justice and OCB. Structural Equation Modelling was adopted in order to examine the efficacy of the identified moderators, and revealed that interactional justice has the strongest moderating effect, followed by distributive justice and finally OCB. Implications of the findings to organizational management and personnel practitioners are discussed accordingly, including; that the occurrence of CWB could be reduced through the implementation of organizational justice enhancement policies; and that the prevalence of OCB atmosphere at work could also help alleviate the impact of personality characteristics on CWB.
引用
收藏
页码:1272 / 1288
页数:17
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
*AM MAN ASS, 2005, WORKPL MON SURV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Society and the adolescent selfimage, DOI [DOI 10.1515/9781400876136, 10.1515/9781400876136]
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   Development of a measure of workplace deviance [J].
Bennett, RJ ;
Robinson, SL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (03) :349-360
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[8]   Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis [J].
Berry, Christopher M. ;
Ones, Deniz S. ;
Sackett, Paul R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) :410-424
[9]  
BIES RobertJ., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[10]   Does one good turn deserve another? Coworker influences on employee citizenship [J].
Bommer, WH ;
Miles, EW ;
Grover, SL .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 24 (02) :181-196