Systematic and Open Identification of Researchers and Authors: Focus on Open Researcher and Contributor ID

被引:26
作者
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri [1 ,2 ]
Akazhanov, Nurbek A. [3 ]
Voronov, Alexander A. [4 ]
Kitas, George D. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Russells Hall Hosp, Teaching Trust, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust,Dept Rheumatol, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Russells Hall Hosp, Teaching Trust, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust,Dept Res & Dev, Dudley DY1 2HQ, W Midlands, England
[3] Kazakh Natl Med Univ, Dept Internship & Residency Gen Practitioners N, Alma Ata, Kazakhstan
[4] Kuban State Univ, Dept Mkt & Trade Deals, Krasnodar 350751, Russia
[5] Univ Manchester, Arthritis Res UK Epidemiol Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Science Communication; Author Identifier; Peer Review; Editing; Research management; ORCID; DATABASES; JOURNALS; NUMBER;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2014.29.11.1453
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Unique identifiers of researchers and authors can help all stakeholders of scientific communications improve their workflows. There have been several attempts to establish professional networks of scholars and list their scholarly achievements on digital platforms. Some of these platforms such as Google Scholar, Web of Knowledge and PubMed are searched to pick relevant peer reviewers, assess authors' publication history or choose suitable candidates for research and academic projects. However, each of these hubs has its specific applications, limiting the universal use for permanent tagging of researcher profiles. The Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) initiative, launched in 2012, is aimed at registering scholarly contributors and averting the persistent ambiguity of recorded author names. The ORCID registry is growing fast and integrating with other ID-generating platforms, thereby increasing the functionality of the integrated systems. ORCID identifiers are increasingly used for selecting peer reviewers and acknowledging various scholarly contributions (e.g., published articles, reviewer comments, conference presentations). The initiative offers unique opportunities for transparent disclosures of author contributions and competing interests and improving ethical standards of research, editing, and publishing.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1456
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Scientists: your number is up [J].
Butler, Declan .
NATURE, 2012, 485 (7400) :564-564
[2]  
CrossRef. CrossRef & ORCID, CROSSREF ORCID
[3]   Unique author identification number in scientific databases: A suggestion [J].
Falagas, Matthew E. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (05) :701-701
[4]   Multidisciplinary Bibliographic Databases [J].
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri ;
Ayvazyan, Lilit ;
Kitas, George D. .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 28 (09) :1270-1275
[5]   Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals [J].
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri ;
Kitas, George D. .
CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (04) :386-389
[6]   ORCID: connecting researchers and scholars with their works [J].
Haak, Laurel L. .
INSIGHTS-THE UKSG JOURNAL, 2013, 26 (03) :239-243
[7]   ORCID: a system to uniquely identify researchers [J].
Haak, Laurel L. ;
Fenner, Martin ;
Paglione, Laura ;
Pentz, Ed ;
Ratner, Howard .
LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2012, 25 (04) :259-264
[8]  
Huh S, 2013, BIOCHEM MEDICA, V23, P235
[9]   Further advantages of a unique author identification number [J].
Joly, Etienne .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2006, 3 (08) :1437-1438
[10]  
Kudos Innovations, KUD ORCID PARTN HELP