Chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in China: a real-world study

被引:8
作者
Yuan, Yang [1 ]
Zhang, Shaohua [1 ]
Yan, Min [2 ,3 ]
Yin, Yongmei [4 ,5 ]
Song, Yuhua [6 ]
Jiang, Zefei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Breast Oncol, Med Ctr 5, 8 East St, Beijing 100071, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Breast Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Dis, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Canc Hosp, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Prov Hosp, Dept Breast Canc, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[6] Qingdao Univ, Dept Breast Canc Ctr, Affiliated Hosp, Qingdao, Peoples R China
关键词
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC); hormone receptor-positive; chemotherapy (CT); endocrine therapy (ET); guideline; AMERICAN SOCIETY; WOMEN; FULVESTRANT; ABEMACICLIB; PALBOCICLIB; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.21037/atm-20-8252
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Although endocrine therapy (ET) is the preferred option for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- MBC), chemotherapy (CT) is still commonly used. The objective of this real-world study was to present the actual choice of first-line treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC and evaluate the consistency with guidelines in China. Methods: Patients with HR+/HER2- MBC between 1996 and September 2018 were identified from of the database of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC). The statistical description was conducted to present the first-line treatment. Factors influencing the prescription of ET or CT were obtained using univariate and multivariate analysis. The consistency of the actual treatment with the guideline of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer (CSCO BC guideline) was evaluated. Results: Of 1,877 patients, 662 (35.3%) received ET, and 1,215 (64.7%) received CT. ET proportion was only 25.4% in 1996-2005 and gradually increased to 44.6% in 2016-2018. Aromatase inhibitors (69% of ET) and taxane-based regimens (66% of CT) were the most commonly used ET and CT, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that patients with age >_60, distant relapse-free interval (DRFI) >_24 months, ER+/PR+, bone metastasis only, or progression on (neo)adjuvant ET were preferably chosen for ET as first line treatment. Factors associated with preferring CT were de novo stage IV, liver or lung metastasis. 17.2% of patients (322 cases) who had neither visceral metastasis nor progression on (neo)adjuvant ET wrongly received CT instead of ET, which is inconsistent with CSCO BC guideline. More than half of patients receiving CT discontinued their initial treatment due to adverse events and other non-disease progression reasons. Conclusions: Although high proportion of HR+/HER2- MBC patients received CT as first-line treatment in China, it is gratifying to see that the proportion of patients receiving ET has gradually increased. Our study revealed that 17.2% of patients were over-treated according to CSCO BC guideline, which may provide data to promote guideline adherence. The clinical application for ET should be appropriately expanded in first-line treatment, especially for patients without visceral disease and proof of endocrine resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Real-World First-Line Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study in China
    Chen, Zhanhong
    Ouyang, Quchang
    Wang, Yongsheng
    Wang, Junsheng
    Wang, Haixue
    Wu, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Peili
    Huang, Jian
    Zheng, Yabing
    Cao, Wenming
    Shao, Xiying
    Xie, Ning
    Tian, Can
    Liang, Hao
    Wang, Cailing
    Zhang, Ying
    Ren, Dianquan
    Wang, Xiaojia
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [32] The dilemma of selecting a first line CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Grinshpun, Albert
    Tolaney, Sara M. M.
    Burstein, Harold J. J.
    Jeselsohn, Rinath
    Mayer, Erica L. L.
    NPJ BREAST CANCER, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [33] Chemotherapy versus endocrine therapy as first-line treatment in patients with luminal-like HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A propensity score analysis
    Bonotto, Marta
    Gerratana, Lorenzo
    Di Maio, Massimo
    De Angelis, Carmine
    Cinausero, Marika
    Moroso, Stefano
    Milano, Monica
    Stanzione, Brigida
    Gargiulo, Piera
    Iacono, Donatella
    Minisini, Alessandro Marco
    Mansutti, Mauro
    Fasola, Gianpiero
    De Placido, Sabino
    Arpino, Grazia
    Puglisi, Fabio
    BREAST, 2017, 31 : 114 - 120
  • [34] Abemaciclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 1b Study
    Tolaney, Sara M.
    Beeram, Muralidhar
    Beck, J. Thaddeus
    Conlin, Alison
    Dees, E. Claire
    Puhalla, Shannon L.
    Rexer, Brent N.
    Burris, Howard A., III
    Jhaveri, Komal
    Helsten, Teresa
    Becerra, Carlos
    Kalinsky, Kevin
    Moore, Kathleen N.
    Manuel, Allison M.
    Lithio, Andrew
    Price, Gregory L.
    Chapman, Sonya C.
    Litchfield, Lacey M.
    Goetz, Matthew P.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11
  • [35] Hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: redrawing the lines
    Matutino, A.
    Joy, A. A.
    Brezden-Masley, C.
    Chia, S.
    Verma, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : S131 - S141
  • [36] Endocrine therapy and palbociclib within a compassionate use program in heavily pretreated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Maurer, Christian
    Ferreira, Arlindo R.
    Martel, Samuel
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Ponde, Noam
    Aftimos, Philippe
    de Azambuja, Evandro
    Piccart, Martine
    BREAST, 2018, 39 : 14 - 18
  • [37] Comparison of Safety and Treatment Continuity of Palbociclib and Abemaciclib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic/Recurrent Breast Cancer
    Go, Makiko
    Kimura, Michio
    Yamada, Shiori
    Usami, Eiseki
    Noguchi, Yoshihiro
    Yoshimura, Tomoaki
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024, 37 (06) : 1258 - 1266
  • [38] Comparison of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy as different systemic treatment modes for metastatic luminal HER2-negative breast cancer patients -A retrospective study
    Liu, Qiuyue
    Qiu, Juan
    Lu, Qianrun
    Ma, Yujin
    Fang, Shu
    Bu, Bing
    Song, Lihua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [39] Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study
    Martin, Miguel
    Zielinski, Christoph
    Ruiz-Borrego, Manuel
    Carrasco, Eva
    Ciruelos, Eva M.
    Munoz, Montserrat
    Bermejo, Begona
    Margeli, Mireia
    Csoszi, Tibor
    Anton, Antonio
    Turner, Nicholas
    Casas, Maria, I
    Morales, Serafin
    Alba, Emilio
    Calvo, Lourdes
    De La Haba-Rodriguez, Juan
    Ramos, Manuel
    Murillo, Laura
    Santaballa, Ana
    Alonso-Romero, Jose L.
    Sanchez-Rovira, Pedro
    Corsaro, Massimo
    Huang, Xin
    Thallinger, Christiane
    Kahan, Zsuzsanna
    Gil-Gil, Miguel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 168 : 12 - 24
  • [40] Assessment of the efficacy of successive endocrine therapies in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-life multicentre national study
    Le Saux, Olivia
    Lardy-Cleaud, Audrey
    Frank, Sophie
    Debled, Marc
    Cottu, Paul H.
    Pistilli, Barbara
    Vanlemmens, Laurence
    Leheurteur, Marianne
    Levy, Christelle
    Laborde, Lilian
    Uwer, Lionel
    D'hondt, Veronique
    Berchery, Delphine
    Lorgis, Veronique
    Ferrero, Jean-Marc
    Perrocheau, Genevieve
    Courtinard, Coralie
    Mouret-Reynier, Marie Ange
    Velten, Michel
    Breton, Mathias
    Parent, Damien
    Chabaud, Sylvie
    Robain, Mathieu
    Bachelot, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 118 : 131 - 141