3D strain gradient elasticity: Variational formulations, isogeometric analysis and model peculiarities

被引:21
作者
Hosseini, S. B. [1 ]
Niiranen, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Civil Engn, POB 12100, Aalto 00076, Finland
关键词
Strain gradient elasticity; Coercivity; Continuity; Isogeometric analysis; Size effect; Homogenization; SCALE IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES; DISPERSIVE WAVE-PROPAGATION; BOUNDARY-VALUE-PROBLEMS; MATRIX REPRESENTATIONS; FINITE-ELEMENTS; SIZE; HOMOGENIZATION; APPROXIMATION; STABILITY; MECHANICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2021.114324
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This article investigates the theoretical and numerical analysis as well as applications of the three-dimensional theory of first strain gradient elasticity. The corresponding continuous and discrete variational formulations are established with error estimates stemming from continuity and coercivity within a Sobolev space framework. An implementation of the corresponding isogeometric Ritz-Galerkin method is provided within the open-source software package GeoPDEs. A thorough numerical convergence analysis is accomplished for confirming the theoretical error estimates and for verifying the software implementation. Lastly, a set of model comparisons is presented for revealing and demonstrating some essential model peculiarities: (1) the 1D Timoshenko beam model is essentially closer to the 3D model than the corresponding Euler-Bernoulli beam model; (2) the 3D model and the 1D beam models agree on the strong size effect typical for microstructural and microarchitectural beam structures; (3) stress singularities of reentrant corners disappear in strain gradient elasticity. The computational homogenization methodologies applied in the examples for microarchitectural beams are shown to possess disadvantages that future research should focus on. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Homogenization of frame lattices leading to second gradient models coupling classical strain and strain-gradient terms [J].
Abdoul-Anziz, Houssam ;
Seppecher, Pierre ;
Bellis, Cedric .
MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS OF SOLIDS, 2019, 24 (12) :3976-3999
[2]   Mixed finite element formulations of strain-gradient elasticity problems [J].
Amanatidou, E ;
Aravas, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2002, 191 (15-16) :1723-1751
[3]  
Anderson TL, 2005, FRACTURE MECH FUNDAM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Finite elements. theory, fast solvers, and applications in solid mechanics
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1965, P 1 C MATR METH STRU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SOLID MECH ITS APPL
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Texts in Applied Mathematics, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0
[8]   TUBA FAMILY OF PLATE ELEMENTS FOR MATRIX DISP LACEMENT METHOD [J].
ARGYRIS, JH ;
FRIED, I ;
SCHARPF, DW .
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 72 (692) :701-&
[9]   Gradient elasticity in statics and dynamics: An overview of formulations, length scale identification procedures, finite element implementations and new results [J].
Askes, Harm ;
Aifantis, Elias C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2011, 48 (13) :1962-1990
[10]   Complete symmetry classification and compact matrix representations for 3D strain gradient elasticity [J].
Auffray, N. ;
He, Q. C. ;
Le Quang, H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 159 :197-210