A critical review about methodologies for the analysis of mucoadhesive properties of drug delivery systems

被引:69
作者
da Silva, Jessica Bassi [1 ]
de Souza Ferreira, Sabrina Barbosa [1 ]
de Freitas, Osvaldo [2 ]
Bruschi, Marcos Luciano [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Pharm, Lab Res & Dev Drug Delivery Syst, Postgrad Program Pharmaceut Sci, Maringa, Paran, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Mucoadhesion; pharmaceutical systems; controlled release; bioadhesion theories; bioadhesion methods; IN-VITRO EVALUATION; ATOMIC-FORCE MICROSCOPY; BETA-LACTOGLOBULIN NANOPARTICLES; QUARTZ-CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE; MODIFIED POLY(ACRYLIC ACID); CHITOSAN-MUCIN INTERACTIONS; ATR-FTIR SPECTROSCOPY; WILHELMY PLATE METHOD; GAMMA-SCINTIGRAPHY; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION;
D O I
10.1080/03639045.2017.1294600
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Mucoadhesion is a useful strategy for drug delivery systems, such as tablets, patches, gels, liposomes, micro/nanoparticles, nanosuspensions, microemulsions and colloidal dispersions. Moreover, it has contributed to many benefits like increased residence time at application sites, drug protection, increased drug permeation and improved drug availability. In this context, investigation into the mucoadhesive properties of pharmaceutical dosage forms is fundamental, in order to characterize, understand and simulate the in vivo interaction between the formulation and the biological substrate, contributing to the development of new mucoadhesive systems with effectiveness, safety and quality. There are a lot of in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo methods for the evaluation of the mucoadhesive properties of drug delivery systems. However, there also is a lack of standardization of these techniques, which makes comparison between the results difficult. Therefore, this work aims to show an overview of the most commonly employed methods for mucoadhesion evaluation, relating them to different proposed systems and using artificial or natural mucosa from humans and animals.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1070
页数:18
相关论文
共 186 条
  • [111] MORTAZAVI SA, 1994, J CONTROL RELEASE, V31, P207
  • [112] Preparation and evaluation of three mucoadhesive dosage forms using 99mTc-Ofloxacin
    Mukherjee, Archana
    Sahoo, Subhashree
    Sarma, Haladhar Dev
    Chakraborti, Chandra Kanti
    Samuel, Grace
    [J]. APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2014, 89 : 192 - 198
  • [113] Buparvaquone mucoadhesive nanosuspension:: preparation, optimisation and long-term stability
    Müller, RH
    Jacobs, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2002, 237 (1-2) : 151 - 161
  • [114] Mylangam C. K., 2014, DRUG DELIV, V23, P1
  • [115] Mucoadhesive delivery systems. I. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers for buccal tablet formulation
    Nafee, NA
    Ismail, FA
    Boraie, NA
    Mortada, LM
    [J]. DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY, 2004, 30 (09) : 985 - 993
  • [116] In vitro techniques to evaluate buccal films
    Nair, Anroop B.
    Kumria, Rachna
    Harsha
    Attimarad, Mahesh
    Al-Dhubiab, Bandar E.
    Alhaider, Ibrahim A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2013, 166 (01) : 10 - 21
  • [117] In vitro and in vivo nasal mucoadhesion of some water-soluble polymers
    Nakamura, F
    Ohta, R
    Machida, Y
    Nagai, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1996, 134 (1-2) : 173 - 181
  • [118] Grewia Gum 2: Mucoadhesive Properties of Compacts and Gels
    Nep, Elijah I.
    Conway, Barbara R.
    [J]. TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [119] Bioadhesive drug delivery systems - I. Characterisation of mucoadhesive properties of systems based on glyceryl mono-oleate and glyceryl monolinoleate
    Nielsen, LS
    Schubert, L
    Hansen, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 6 (03) : 231 - 239
  • [120] Preactivated hyaluronic acid: A potential mucoadhesive polymer for vaginal delivery
    Nowak, Jessika
    Laffleur, Flavia
    Bernkop-Schnuerch, Andreas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2015, 478 (01) : 383 - 389