Regional Opportunities for China to Go Low-Carbon: Results from the REEC Model

被引:11
作者
Duan, Hongbo [1 ]
Zhu, Lei [2 ]
Kumbaroglu, Guerkan [2 ,3 ]
Fan, Ying [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Bogazici Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Integrated modeling; Emissions trading scheme; Multiple uncertainties; Energy restructuring; Technological substitution; EMISSIONS TRADING SCHEME; CAP-AND-TRADE; TRANSACTION COSTS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CO2; EMISSIONS; EQUILIBRIUM-ANALYSIS; IMPACT; ENERGY; PERMITS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.5547/01956574.37.SI1.hdua
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The intention of this paper is to (i) introduce a multi-regional dynamic emissions trading model and (ii) examine the potential impact of an emissions trading scheme (ETS) on the long-term evolution of energy technologies from national and regional perspectives in China. The establishment of this model is a salutary attempt to Sinicize the global integrated assessment model that combines economy, energy, and environment systems. The simulation results indicate that: (1) for majority of regions, ETS is more effective in cutting CO, emissions than a harmonized carbon tax (HCT), but this might not be true for the entire country, which means that these two options have little difference in overall carbon reduction; (2) carbon tax policy is a more cost-effective option in curbing CO, with respect to ETS in the long run; (3) neither ETS nor pure carbon tax provide enough incentives for the breakthrough of carbon-free energy technologies", which illustrates that matching with some other support policies, such as subsidies and R&D investment, is essential to extend the niche market; and (4) In the context of ETS, the diffusion of non-fossil technologies in regions that act as sellers performs much better than this diffusion in the buyer regions.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 252
页数:30
相关论文
共 67 条
[41]   TRADABLE CARBON PERMITS IN EUROPE - FEASIBILITY AND COMPARISON WITH TAXES [J].
KOUTSTAAL, P ;
NENTJES, A .
JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 1995, 33 (02) :219-233
[42]   The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies [J].
Kriegler, Elmar ;
Weyant, John P. ;
Blanford, Geoffrey J. ;
Krey, Volker ;
Clarke, Leon ;
Edmonds, Jae ;
Fawcett, Allen ;
Luderer, Gunnar ;
Riahi, Keywan ;
Richels, Richard ;
Rose, Steven K. ;
Tavoni, Massimo ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) :353-367
[43]   CO2, GDP and RET:: An aggregate economic equilibrium analysis for Turkey [J].
Kumbaroglu, Guerkan ;
Karali, Nihan ;
Arikan, Yidiz .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (07) :2694-2708
[44]   Analysis of the impacts of combining carbon taxation and emission trading on different industry sectors [J].
Lee, Cheng F. ;
Lin, Sue J. ;
Lewis, Charles .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (02) :722-729
[45]   Potential cost savings from internal/external CO2 emissions trading in the Korean electric power industry [J].
Lee, Myunghun .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) :6162-6167
[46]   Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme? [J].
Lehmann, Paul ;
Gawel, Erik .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 :597-607
[47]   Cap-and-trade, taxes, and distributional conflict [J].
MacKenzie, Ian A. ;
Ohndorf, Markus .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 63 (01) :51-65
[48]   The impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme on US aviation [J].
Malina, Robert ;
McConnachie, Dominic ;
Winchester, Niven ;
Wollersheim, Christoph ;
Paltsev, Sergey ;
Waitz, Ian A. .
JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 :36-41
[49]   Learning rates for energy technologies [J].
McDonald, A ;
Schrattenholzer, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 2001, 29 (04) :255-261
[50]   What to expect from an international system of tradable permits for carbon emissions [J].
McKibbin, WJ ;
Shackleton, R ;
Wilcoxen, PJ .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1999, 21 (3-4) :319-346