Comparison of measurement uncertainty calculation methods on example of indirect tensile strength measurement

被引:5
|
作者
Tutmez, Bulent [1 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Dept Min Engn, Malatya, Turkey
关键词
measurement uncertainty; Brazilian test; GUM; fuzzy set; Monte Carlo method; ROCK-MECHANICS; BRAZILIAN TEST; SHEAR;
D O I
10.12989/gae.2017.12.6.871
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Indirect measure of the tensile strength of laboratory samples is an important topic in rock engineering. One of the most important tests, the Brazilian strength test is performed to obtain the tensile strength of rock, concrete and other quasi brittle materials. Because the measurements are provided indirectly and the inspected rock materials may have heterogeneous properties, uncertainty quantification is required for a reliable test evaluation. In addition to the conventional measurement evaluation uncertainty methods recommended by the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), such as Taylor's and Monte Carlo Methods, a fuzzy set-based approach is also proposed and resulting uncertainties are discussed. The results showed that when a tensile strength measurement is measured by a laboratory test, its uncertainty can also be expressed by one of the methods presented.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 882
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo method for evaluation measurement uncertainty of indirect measurements
    Sediva, Sona
    Havlikova, Marie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 14TH INTERNATIONAL CARPATHIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ICCC), 2013, : 325 - 329
  • [2] Comparison of the Monte Carlo and guide to uncertainty in measurement methods in estimating measurement uncertainty: Indirect measurement of the CaMV35S promoter in mixed samples of genetically modified soybean
    Song, Jun
    Niu, Bei
    Wang, Dong
    Zhang, Fuli
    FOOD CONTROL, 2018, 90 : 131 - 139
  • [3] Determination of measurement uncertainty - Comparison of results from calculation and experiment
    Hinrichs, W
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2006, 73 (05) : 301 - 307
  • [4] Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty of perspiration measurement systems
    Chen, Andrew
    Chen, Chiachung
    MEASUREMENT, 2016, 87 : 27 - 37
  • [5] Comparison of the linear and non linear methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty
    Martins M.A.F.
    Kalid R.A.
    Nery G.A.
    Teixeira L.A.
    Gonçalves G.A.A.
    Controle y Automacao, 2010, 21 (06): : 557 - 576
  • [6] Determination of the Measurement Uncertainty of Direct and Indirect Efficiency Measurement Methods in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines
    Yogal, N.
    Lehrmann, C.
    Henke, M.
    2018 XIII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES (ICEM), 2018, : 1149 - 1156
  • [7] Determining measurement uncertainty in nanometrology with the example of nanoclusters
    Weckenmann, A
    Wiedenhöfer, T
    Sommer, KD
    TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2004, 71 (02): : 93 - 100
  • [8] Determination of Measurement Uncertainty: Magnetic Field Measurement as an Example
    Ihlenburg, Lutz
    Heinze, Hartmut
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2011, 78 (06) : 315 - 320
  • [9] Analysis and Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation
    Cheng, Yin-bao
    Chen, Xiao-huai
    Li, Hong-li
    Cheng, Zhen-ying
    Jiang, Rui
    Lu, Jing
    Fu, Hua-dong
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [10] Evaluation of the measurement uncertainty of the stiffness modulus: Test case of indirect tensile on cylindrical specimens
    Mezouara H.
    Dlimi L.
    Salih A.
    Afechcar M.
    Zniker H.
    International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 2021, 12