Visual Outcomes and Accommodative Response of the Lumina Accommodative Intraocular Lens

被引:33
作者
Alio, Jorge L. [1 ,2 ]
Simonov, Aleksey [3 ]
Plaza-Puche, Ana Belen [1 ]
Angelov, Alexander [4 ]
Angelov, Yavor [4 ]
Van Lawick, Willem [3 ]
Rombach, Michiel [3 ]
机构
[1] Vissum Alicante, Alicante, Spain
[2] Univ Miguel Hernandez, Div Ophthalmol, Alicante, Spain
[3] AkkoLens Clin Bv, Breda, Netherlands
[4] Resbiomed Vissum Sofia Eye Clin, Sofia, Bulgaria
关键词
CLINICAL-EVALUATION; CRYSTALENS; IMPLANTATION; PERFORMANCE; RESTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2016.01.006
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare visual acuity, accommodation, and contrast sensitivity of the AkkoLens Lumina accommodative intraocular lens (AkkoLens Clinical b.v., Breda, The Netherlands) with a standard monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. METHODS: The study enrolled 86 eyes with cataract that all required cataract surgery and IOL implantation. The study group included 61 eyes that were implanted with. the Lumina. The control group included 25 eyes that were implanted with an Acrysof SA60AT (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) monofocal IOL. The distance and near visual acuities, contrast sensitivity, and accommodation were measured over a 1-year follow-up period. Accommodation was measured subjectively, using defocus curves, and objectively, with an open-field autorefractor. RESULTS: Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities did not differ significantly between the groups (P >= .21) over the 12 months. However, the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was 0.07 +/- 0.08 logRAD for the Lumina group and 0.37 +/- 0.19 logRAD for the control group (P < .01) and the corrected distance near visual acuity (CDNVA) was 0.11 +/- 0.12 LogRAD for the Lumina group and 0.41 +/- 0.15 LogRAD for the control group (P < .01). Defocus curves showed a statistically significant difference between groups for defocus ranging from -4.50 to -0.50 diopters (D) (P < .01) with significantly higher visual acuities for the Lumina group. Subjective accommodation, as determined from defocus curves, was 3.05 +/- 1.06, 3.87 +/- 1.27, and 5.59 +/- 1.02 D for the Lumina group and 1.46 +/- 0.54, 2.00 +/- 0.52, and 3.67 +/- 0.75 D for the control group at visual acuities of 0.10, 0.20, and 0.4 logMAR for both groups, respectively. The objective accommodation, measured by an open-field autorefractor, was 0.63 +/- 0.41, 0.69 +/- 0.45, 0.91 +/- 0.51, and 1.27 +/- 0.76 D for the Lumina group and 0.10 +/- 0.15, 0.12 +/- 0.15, -0.06 +/- 0.09 and 0.07 +/- 0.10 D for the control group at accommodation stimuli of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 4.0 D, respectively. Contrast sensitivity was the same for both groups (P >= .26). CONCLUSIONS: The Lumina accommodative IOL effectively restores the visual function, accommodation, and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with no influence on the postoperative contrast sensitivity. (C) 2016 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Study of the Force Dynamics at the Capsular Interface Related to Ciliary Body Stimulation in a Primate Model [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Ben-Nun, Joshua .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 31 (02) :124-128
[2]   Visual Outcomes of a Trifocal Aspheric Diffractive Intraocular Lens With Microincision Cataract Surgery [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Montalban, Raul ;
Pena-Garcia, Pablo ;
Soria, Felipe A. ;
Vega-Estrada, Alfredo .
JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 29 (11) :756-761
[3]   Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Plaza-Puche, Ana B. ;
Montalban, Raul ;
Ortega, Paula .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (09) :1568-1575
[4]   Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Plaza-Puche, Ana B. ;
Montalban, Raul ;
Javaloy, Jaime .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 38 (06) :978-985
[5]   Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Pinero, David P. ;
Plaza-Puche, Ana B. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (10) :1656-1664
[6]   Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept [J].
Alio, Jorge L. ;
Ben-nun, Joshua ;
Rodriguez-Prats, Jose L. ;
Plaza, Ana B. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 35 (10) :1671-1678
[7]  
Alvarez LW, 1967, US patent, Patent No. [3305294, 3,305,294]
[8]   Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens [J].
Beiko, George H. H. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (01) :48-55
[9]   Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens - Results of the US Food and Drug Administration clinical trial [J].
Cumming, JS ;
Colvard, DM ;
Dell, SJ ;
Doane, J ;
Fine, IH ;
Hoffman, RS ;
Packer, M ;
Slade, SG .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (05) :812-825
[10]   Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: Literature review of benefits and side effects [J].
de Vries, Niels E. ;
Nuijts, Rudy M. M. A. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (02) :268-278