Measuring the potential for cognitive activation via teaching materials in mathematics lessons

被引:0
作者
Herbert, Benjamin [1 ]
Schweig, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Bildungsforsch & Bildungsinfor, DIPF, Lehr & Lernqualitat Bildungseinrichtungen, Rostocker Str 6, D-60323 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] RAND Corp, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90403 USA
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERZIEHUNGSWISSENSCHAFT | 2021年 / 24卷 / 04期
关键词
Artifact; Measurement; Potential for Cognitive Activation; Teaching Materials; Teaching Quality; CURRICULUM MATERIALS; QUALITY; STUDENTS; INSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE; TEACHERS; CLASSROOM; SCHOOL; TASKS;
D O I
10.1007/s11618-021-01020-9
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A central challenge of instructional research is to measure teaching characteristics appropriately. The assessment of (filmed) instruction by trained raters is regarded as the best way to achieve this, but is associated with high organizational and time costs. In this paper, we present a newly developed instrument for assessing the teaching quality characteristic potential for cognitive activation (PCA). The instrument was developed for mathematics lessons on the topic of quadratic equations. It is based on the joint evaluation of all instructional artifacts of a lesson (lesson plans, student assignments, assessments, etc.) by trained raters and measures the potential for cognitive activation brought into the classroom by the teacher in writing. The validity of the intended interpretation as an indicator for the written PCA of a lesson is examined by an argument-based approach and can be supported by various pieces of evidence: For example, a decision study shows that the instrument can already be reliably assessed by a single rater. Furthermore, it correlates substantially with a measurement of the PCA based on video ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 983
页数:29
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, ZDM-MATH EDUC, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02652739
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, MATHEMATISCHE NATURW
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, TEACHERS ASSIGNMENTS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, Standards for educational and psychological testing
  • [5] Aschbacher, 1999, DEV INDICATORS CLASS
  • [6] Barnes D., 2007, USING ARTIFACTS DESC
  • [7] Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress
    Baumert, Juergen
    Kunter, Mareike
    Blum, Werner
    Brunner, Martin
    Voss, Thamar
    Jordan, Alexander
    Klusmann, Uta
    Krauss, Stefan
    Neubrand, Michael
    Tsai, Yi-Miau
    [J]. AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (01) : 133 - 180
  • [8] Bell CA., 2020, Global Teaching InSights: AVideo Study of Teaching
  • [9] An Argument Approach to Observation Protocol Validity
    Bell, Courtney A.
    Gitomer, Drew H.
    McCaffrey, Daniel F.
    Hamre, Bridget K.
    Pianta, Robert C.
    Qi, Yi
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (2-3) : 62 - 87
  • [10] FACTORING ITEMS AND FACTORING SCALES ARE DIFFERENT - SPURIOUS EVIDENCE FOR MULTIDIMENSIONALITY DUE TO ITEM CATEGORIZATION
    BERNSTEIN, IH
    TENG, G
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) : 467 - 477