Prospective long-term results and quality-of-life assessment after Dura-II penile prosthesis placement

被引:26
作者
Ferguson, KH
Cespedes, RD [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Dept Urol MCSU, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02270-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To evaluate prospectively the long-term device reliability and patient satisfaction after Dura-II malleable penile prosthesis implantation. Methods. Between 1992 and 1996, 94 patients underwent Dura-II implantation for erectile dysfunction. Patients were prospectively examined and completed standardized questionnaires regarding sexual activity, prosthesis function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall quality of life. An independent statistician analyzed these data. Results. The mean patient age was 63 years, and the mean patient follow-up was 5.7 years. Eighty-five patients were available for long-term evaluation. Fourteen patients died during the follow-up period. One patient was lost to follow-up, and eight prostheses (9%) were explanted; however, no mechanical defects were found in the explanted prostheses. Seventy-six percent and 87% of patients reported satisfactory rigidity and ease of concealing the device, respectively. Seventy-six percent of patients remained sexually active during the evaluation period, and 87% of patients reported that the prosthesis improved their overall quality of life. Eighty-five percent would undergo the implant surgery again, and 88% percent of patients would recommend the Dura-II prosthesis to a friend. Conclusions. The Dura-II malleable penile prosthesis provides good rigidity, ability to conceal the device, and mechanical reliability, as demonstrated by the results of this long-term study. Most patients stated they would have the prosthesis placed again and would recommend it to a friend.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 441
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   EDITS: Development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction [J].
Althof, SE ;
Corty, EW ;
Levine, SB ;
Levine, F ;
Burnett, AL ;
McVary, K ;
Stecher, V ;
Seftel, AD .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (04) :793-799
[2]   THE JONAS PROSTHESIS - TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND RESULTS [J].
BENSON, RC ;
BARRETT, DM ;
PATTERSON, DE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 130 (05) :920-922
[3]   LONG-TERM RESULTS WITH THE JONAS MALLEABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS [J].
BENSON, RC ;
PATTERSON, DE ;
BARRETT, DM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1985, 134 (05) :899-901
[4]   Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: Results of a long-term multicenter study [J].
Carson, CC ;
Mulcahy, JJ ;
Govier, FE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (02) :376-380
[5]  
DORFINGER T, 1986, UROLOGY, V6, P480
[6]   Safety and efficacy outcome of mentor alpha-1 inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impotence treatment [J].
Goldstein, I ;
Newman, L ;
Baum, N ;
Brooks, M ;
Chaikin, L ;
Goldberg, K ;
McBride, A ;
Krane, RJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (03) :833-839
[7]   Report of a multicenter clinical evaluation of the dura-II penile prosthesis [J].
Kearse, WS ;
Sago, AL ;
Peretsman, SJ ;
Bolton, JO ;
Holcomb, RG ;
Reddy, PK ;
Bernhard, PH ;
Eppel, SM ;
Lewis, JH ;
Gladshteyn, M ;
Melman, AA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (05) :1613-1616
[8]  
LEWIS RW, 1995, UROL CLIN N AM, V22, P847
[9]   EXPERIENCE WITH THE AMS-600 MALLEABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS [J].
MOUL, JW ;
MCLEOD, DG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1986, 135 (05) :929-931
[10]   DURAPHASE PENILE PROSTHESIS - RESULTS OF CLINICAL-TRIALS IN 63 PATIENTS [J].
MULCAHY, JJ ;
KRANE, RJ ;
LLOYD, LK ;
EDSON, M ;
SIROKY, MB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 143 (03) :518-519