Correlation between Protonation of Tailor-Made Polypiperazines and Endosomal Escape for Cytosolic Protein Delivery

被引:22
作者
Hausig, Franziska [1 ]
Sobotta, Fabian H. [1 ]
Richter, Friederike [1 ]
Harz, Dominic O. [1 ]
Traeger, Anja [1 ,2 ]
Brendel, Johannes C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Lab Organ & Macromol Chem IOMC, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Friedrich Schiller Univ Jena, Jena Ctr Soft Matter JCSM, D-07743 Jena, Germany
关键词
membrane leakage; calcein release; endosomolytic polymers; pH-responsive polymers; basicity; GENE DELIVERY; TRANSFECTION EFFICIENCY; LIPID NANOPARTICLES; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT; CATIONIC LIPIDS; IN-VITRO; SIRNA; POLYETHYLENIMINE; BLOCK; POLYMERS;
D O I
10.1021/acsami.1c00829
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Responsive polymers, which become protonated at decreasing pH, are considered a milestone in the development of synthetic cell entry vectors. Exact correlations between their properties and their ability to escape the endosome, however, often remain elusive due to hydrophobic interactions or limitations in the design of water-soluble materials with suitable basicity. Here, we present a series of well-defined, hydrophilic polypiperazines, where systematic variation of the amino moiety facilitates an unprecedented fine-tuning of the basicity or pK(a) value within the physiologically relevant range (pH 6-7.4). Coincubation of HEK 293T cells with various probes, including small fluorophores or functioning proteins, revealed a rapid increase of endosomal release for polymers with pK(a) values above 6.5 or 7 in serum-free or serum-containing media, respectively. Similarly, cytotoxic effects became severe at increased pK(a) values (>7). Although the window for effective transport appears narrow, the discovered correlations offer a principal guideline for the design of effective polymers for endosomal escape.
引用
收藏
页码:35233 / 35247
页数:15
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Biodegradable poly (ethylenimine) for plasmid DNA delivery [J].
Ahn, CH ;
Chae, SY ;
Bae, YH ;
Kim, SW .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2002, 80 (1-3) :273-282
[2]   Multiparametric approach for the evaluation of lipid nanoparticles for siRNA delivery [J].
Alabi, Christopher A. ;
Love, Kevin T. ;
Sahay, Gaurav ;
Yin, Hao ;
Luly, Kathryn M. ;
Langer, Robert ;
Anderson, Daniel G. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (32) :12881-12886
[3]   Efficient Delivery of Macromolecules into Human Cells by Improving the Endosomal Escape Activity of Cell-Penetrating Peptides: Lessons Learned from dfTAT and its Analogs [J].
Allen, Jason K. ;
Brock, Dakota J. ;
Kondow-McConaghy, Helena M. ;
Pellois, Jean-Philippe .
BIOMOLECULES, 2018, 8 (03)
[4]  
Behr JP, 1997, CHIMIA, V51, P34
[5]   The Possible "Proton Sponge" Effect of Polyethylenimine (PEI) Does Not Include Change in Lysosomal pH [J].
Benjaminsen, Rikke V. ;
Mattebjerg, Maria A. ;
Henriksen, Jonas R. ;
Moghimi, S. Moein ;
Andresen, Thomas L. .
MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2013, 21 (01) :149-157
[6]   Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery [J].
Blanco, Elvin ;
Shen, Haifa ;
Ferrari, Mauro .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (09) :941-951
[7]   A VERSATILE VECTOR FOR GENE AND OLIGONUCLEOTIDE TRANSFER INTO CELLS IN CULTURE AND IN-VIVO - POLYETHYLENIMINE [J].
BOUSSIF, O ;
LEZOUALCH, F ;
ZANTA, MA ;
MERGNY, MD ;
SCHERMAN, D ;
DEMENEIX, B ;
BEHR, JP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1995, 92 (16) :7297-7301
[8]   Breaking up the correlation between efficacy and toxicity for nonviral gene delivery [J].
Breunig, Miriam ;
Lungwitz, Uta ;
Liebl, Renate ;
Goepferich, Achim .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (36) :14454-14459
[9]   The great escape: how cationic polyplexes overcome the endosomal barrier [J].
Bus, Tanja ;
Traeger, Anja ;
Schubert, Ulrich S. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B, 2018, 6 (43) :6904-6918
[10]   Adenovirus: a blueprint for non-viral gene delivery [J].
Chailertvanitkul, V. Ann ;
Pouton, Colin W. .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 21 (05) :627-632