How to Evaluate the Long-Term Care Agencies Performance?

被引：1

作者：

Kuo, Hsiao-I ^{[1
]}

Hung, Jui-Ying ^{[1
]}

Yang, Chien-Hui ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Chaoyang Univ Technol, Dept Golden Ager Ind Management, Taichung, Taiwan

[2] Adult & Continuing Educ Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Chiayi, Taiwan

来源：

ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS | 2018年 / 24卷 / 07期

关键词：

Long-Term Care Agencies; Service Performance Evaluation System; Evaluation Criteria; Balance Scorecard;

D O I：

10.1166/asl.2018.11199

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

This research seeks to investigate the steps that central and local governments must take when using strategic service performance management tools to perform routine evaluations of long-term care agencies. It focuses on the 2012 Evaluation Plan used in Taichung City in Taiwan. This research uses a performance management tool-Balance Scorecard (BSC), as well as the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM) and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) to condense the five major evaluation dimensions of the current "Indicators in the Evaluation of Long-term care agencies" in order to establish evaluation framework. Long-term care agencies can apply management-by-objectives (MBO) to establish links between the healthcare services provided by the organization, workflow management control, and performance evaluation indicators.

引用

页码：4782 / 4785

页数：4

共 10 条

[1] [Anonymous], J LONG TERM CARE
[2] [Anonymous], STAT REP SEN CIT WEL
[3] [Anonymous], SOCIAL BUREAU TAICHU
[4] [Anonymous], SOCIAL POLICY SOCIAL
[5] [Anonymous], DEC PLAN LONG TERM C
[6] [Anonymous], LONG TERM CAR FAC TA
[7] KAPLAN RS, 1992, HARVARD BUS REV, V70, P71
[8] WHO, 2003, WHO TECH REP SER, V916, P1
[9] FUZZY SETS
ZADEH, LA
[J]. INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1965, 8 (03): : 338 - &
[10] ZELMAN W., 2003, Journal of Health Care Finance, V29, P4

← 1 →