Quantifying errors in flow measurement using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of several boundary detection methods

被引:33
|
作者
Jiang, Jing [1 ,4 ]
Kokeny, Paul [1 ,5 ]
Ying, Wang [1 ,2 ]
Magnano, Chris [3 ]
Zivadinov, Robert [3 ]
Haacke, E. Mark [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang, Liaoning Provin, Peoples R China
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo Neuroimaging Anal Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Magnet Resonance Innovat Inc, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Vessel segmentation; Flow quantification; Flow error; VESSEL AREA; BLOOD-FLOW; VELOCITY DATA; ACCURACY; PRECISION; MRI; QUANTIFICATION; PARAMETERS; VEINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Quantifying flow from phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) data requires that the vessels of interest be segmented. The estimate of the vessel area will dictate the type and magnitude of the error sources that affect the flow measurement. These sources of errors are well understood, and mathematical expressions have been derived for them in previous work. However, these expressions contain many parameters that render them difficult to use for making practical error estimates. In this work, some realistic assumptions were made that allow for the simplification of such expressions in order to make them more useful. These simplified expressions were then used to numerically simulate the effect of segmentation accuracy and provide some criteria that if met, would keep errors in flow quantification below 10% or 5%. Four different segmentation methods were used on simulated and phantom MRA data to verify the theoretical results. Numerical simulations showed that including partial volumed edge pixels in vessel segmentation provides less error than missing them. This was verified with MRA simulations, as the best performing segmentation method generally included such pixels. Further, it was found that to obtain a flow error of less than 10% (5%), the vessel should be at least 4 (5) pixels in diameter, have an SNR of at least 10:1 and have a peak velocity to saturation cut-off velocity ratio of at least 5:3. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold
    Bolen, Michael A.
    Setser, Randolph M.
    Gabriel, Ruvin S.
    Renapurkar, Rahul D.
    Tandon, Yasmeen
    Lieber, Michael L.
    Desai, Milind Y.
    Flamm, Scott D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 29 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [22] Comparing cardiac output measurements using electrical cardiometry versus phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Sumbel, Lydia
    Nagaraju, Lakshmi
    Ogbeifun, Henry
    Agarwal, Arpit
    Bhalala, Utpal
    PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 66
  • [23] 4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography
    Gabbour, Maya
    Schnell, Susanne
    Jarvis, Kelly
    Robinson, Joshua D.
    Markl, Michael
    Rigsby, Cynthia K.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (06) : 804 - 813
  • [24] The clinical impact of phase offset errors and different correction methods in cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging: a multi-scanner study
    Savine C. S. Minderhoud
    Nikki van der Velde
    Jolanda J. Wentzel
    Rob J. van der Geest
    Mohammed Attrach
    Piotr A. Wielopolski
    Ricardo P. J. Budde
    Willem A. Helbing
    Jolien W. Roos-Hesselink
    Alexander Hirsch
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 22
  • [25] Optimal velocity encoding during measurement of cerebral blood flow volume using phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography
    Guo, Gang
    Yang, Yonggui
    Yang, Weiqun
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (23) : 1796 - 1800
  • [26] Blood Flow of Ophthalmic Artery in Healthy Individuals Determined by Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Ambarki, Khalid
    Hallberg, Per
    Johannesson, Gauti
    Linden, Christina
    Zarrinkoob, Laleh
    Wahlin, Anders
    Birgander, Richard
    Malm, Jan
    Eklund, Anders
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (04) : 2738 - 2745
  • [27] MEASUREMENT OF ABSOLUTE EPICARDIAL CORONARY-ARTERY FLOW AND FLOW RESERVE WITH BREATH-HOLD CINE PHASE-CONTRAST MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    CLARKE, GD
    ECKELS, R
    CHANEY, C
    SMITH, D
    DITTRICH, J
    HUNDLEY, WG
    NESSAIVER, M
    LI, HF
    PARKEY, RW
    PESHOCK, RM
    CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (10) : 2627 - 2634
  • [28] Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire
    Machida, Haruhiko
    Komori, Yoshiaki
    Ueno, Eiko
    Shen, Yun
    Hirata, Masami
    Kojima, Shinya
    Sato, Munekuni
    Okazaki, Takeshi
    Masukawa, Ai
    Morita, Satoru
    Suzuki, Kazufumi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (08): : 571 - 577
  • [29] One and a Half Ventricle Repair in Adults: Postoperative Hemodynamic Assessment Using Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Chung, Jin Woo
    Goo, Hyun Woo
    Im, Yu-Mi
    Shin, Hong-Ju
    Jhang, Won Kyoung
    Ko, Jae-Kon
    Yun, Tae-Jin
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (01) : 193 - 199
  • [30] Cardiac-gated, phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography is a reliable and reproducible technique for quantifying blood flow in canine major cranial abdominal vessels
    Del Chicca, Francesca
    Schwarz, Andrea
    Grest, Paula
    Willmitzer, Florian
    Dennler, Matthias
    Kircher, Patrick R.
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2018, 59 (04) : 423 - 431