Quantifying errors in flow measurement using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of several boundary detection methods

被引:33
|
作者
Jiang, Jing [1 ,4 ]
Kokeny, Paul [1 ,5 ]
Ying, Wang [1 ,2 ]
Magnano, Chris [3 ]
Zivadinov, Robert [3 ]
Haacke, E. Mark [1 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Detroit, MI USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang, Liaoning Provin, Peoples R China
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo Neuroimaging Anal Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Radiol, Detroit, MI USA
[5] Magnet Resonance Innovat Inc, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Vessel segmentation; Flow quantification; Flow error; VESSEL AREA; BLOOD-FLOW; VELOCITY DATA; ACCURACY; PRECISION; MRI; QUANTIFICATION; PARAMETERS; VEINS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Quantifying flow from phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) data requires that the vessels of interest be segmented. The estimate of the vessel area will dictate the type and magnitude of the error sources that affect the flow measurement. These sources of errors are well understood, and mathematical expressions have been derived for them in previous work. However, these expressions contain many parameters that render them difficult to use for making practical error estimates. In this work, some realistic assumptions were made that allow for the simplification of such expressions in order to make them more useful. These simplified expressions were then used to numerically simulate the effect of segmentation accuracy and provide some criteria that if met, would keep errors in flow quantification below 10% or 5%. Four different segmentation methods were used on simulated and phantom MRA data to verify the theoretical results. Numerical simulations showed that including partial volumed edge pixels in vessel segmentation provides less error than missing them. This was verified with MRA simulations, as the best performing segmentation method generally included such pixels. Further, it was found that to obtain a flow error of less than 10% (5%), the vessel should be at least 4 (5) pixels in diameter, have an SNR of at least 10:1 and have a peak velocity to saturation cut-off velocity ratio of at least 5:3. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A Novel Measurement System for Cardiac Flow Analysis Applied to Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart
    Wong, K. K. L.
    Kelso, R. M.
    Worthley, S. G.
    Sanders, P.
    Mazumdar, J.
    Abbott, D.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 2 - DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, 2009, 25 : 596 - 599
  • [12] Cervical compressive myelopathy: flow analysis of cerebrospinal fluid using phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
    Bae, Yun Jung
    Lee, Joon Woo
    Lee, Eugene
    Yeom, Jin S.
    Kim, Ki-Jeong
    Kang, Heung Sik
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [13] Measurement of Two Phase Flow in Porous Medium Using High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Jiang Lanlan
    Song Yongchen
    Liu Yu
    Yang Mingjun
    Zhu Ningjun
    Wang Xiaojing
    Dou Binlin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 21 (01) : 85 - 93
  • [14] Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Pulmonary (QP) to Systemic (QS) Flows Using 4D Phase-contrast Imaging: Pilot Study Comparison with Standard Through-plane 2D Phase-contrast Imaging
    Hanneman, Kate
    Sivagnanam, Milani
    Nguyen, Elsie T.
    Wald, Rachel
    Greiser, Andreas
    Crean, Andrew M.
    Ley, Sebastian
    Wintersperger, Bernd J.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 21 (08) : 1002 - 1008
  • [15] Reproducibility of total cerebral blood flow measurements using phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging
    Spilt, A
    Box, FMA
    van der Geest, RJ
    Reiber, JHC
    Kunz, P
    Kamper, AM
    Blauw, GJ
    van Buchem, MA
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [16] Common Carotid Artery Volume Flow: A Comparison Study between Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging and Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Brandt, Andreas Hjelm
    Olesen, Jacob Bjerring
    Moshavegh, Ramin
    Jensen, Jorgen Arendt
    Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
    Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
    NEUROLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 13 (03) : 269 - 278
  • [17] Magnetic resonance imaging measurement of volume magnetic susceptibility using a boundary condition
    Wang, ZYJ
    Li, SC
    Haselgrove, JC
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 1999, 140 (02) : 477 - 481
  • [18] Normal ranges and test-retest reproducibility of flow and velocity parameters in intracranial arteries measured with phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
    de Verdier, Maria Correia
    Wikstrom, Johan
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2016, 58 (05) : 521 - 531
  • [19] A versatile tool for flow analysis in 3D-phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging
    Unterhinninghofen, R.
    Ley, S.
    Zaporozhan, J.
    Szabo, G.
    Dillmann, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2006, 1 : 111 - 113
  • [20] Comparison of Dual to Single Contrast Bolus Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease
    Groothuis, Jan G. J.
    Kremers, Frans P. P. J.
    Beek, Aernout M.
    Brinckman, Stijn L.
    Tuinenburg, Alvin C.
    Jerosch-Herold, Michael
    van Rossum, Albert C.
    Hofman, Mark B. M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (01) : 88 - 93